Cheers to Substack. Time to start looking into these reader numbers. No way he has 174,000 real subscribers, before the hysteria he had little engagement on his posts. Same goes for Katz.
I disagree. These are the ones who were bullied, afraid of their own shadow, would rather be at the back of the line than get a fat lip from standing up to the bullies. Now, in adulthood and their blue-bubbles they feel somehow important.
I hadn't looked at it that way, and I think you're right about that. I also think they weren't loved as children and that they have dissociative disorder to some degree or another. They're very dangerous.
Jonathan Myerson Katz is a journalist and author who has reported on politics, conflict, human migration, and disasters around the world. His work has appeared in the New York Times and New York Times Magazine, the Atlantic, Foreign Policy, New Republic, New Yorker, Washington Post, Guardian, and elsewhere.
For eight years, Katz was a reporter and editor for the Associated Press.....
Does anyone better epitomize how horrendously propagandist establishment journalism is now?
PS: If Biden wins in 2024 Substack will be under enormous pressure to deplatform hysterics like 2nd Smartest Guy in the World. They're already thinking now they can throw a little piece of offal at the howlers and get them to back off.
Anyone who really believes in the sanctity of free speech should be writing to Substack to express disappointment with what they've just done.
The Taylor Swift idolators (18 and over) alone probably have it in the bag! That's why you see Swift plastered all over mainstream. They're using her. She's made it very clear she's anti-Trump and all he stands for.
It's an excellent thing that so far at least almost all of us can express our viewpoints freely here on Substack subject of course to the hospitality of individual Substackers.
I believe they will TRY to steal the election. But that's if we even HAVE an election. That President Trump is wiping the floor with ALL of his challengers so far and showing major voter preference points over Biden should give us pause to remember that the Globalist/ Uniparty/ Deep State can, is already interfering, and will ramp up its interference with the 2024 election for certain.
I call Biden the Resident or use no title at all (he deserves worse). I only refer to Pres. D.J. Trump as President. History will show this to be correct.
I have long suspected that the NY Times and other mainstream newspapers stay in business by having fake digital subscriptions - the propaganda value is worth it for those willing to pay.
If so, NY Times insider Casey Newton would be aware of it and whatever dark organization fakes digital subscribers to launder money.
There are no shortages of govt workers with jobs for life who might subscribe and believe all this propaganda BUT yea, fake subscriptions would help to launder money and make it look organic...
He admitted that the promotion that Substack uses through Notes and having publications recommend other publications readers may want to subscribe to gained him an additional 70,000 readers. He wasn't the least bit thankful for the boost in readers. Instead, he claimed that was a problem because the so called "Nazis" would be boosted, as well. Talk about being ungrateful 😂
He looks injected. Has anyone asked about the science that says the vaccine will stop transmission and infection? How did masks do stoping all airborne viruses for the last 20 years including most recently in Japan?
Alright to satisfy your curiosity (though 99% sure yours is only a rhetorical question) I'll do this from my memory of what I read from this SS rather than re-reading to disambiguate what you indicate is clear:
I thought that the owners of Substack had refused to censor or deplatform the alleged Nazis as was the demand of the NYT journalist and his posse of umbrage-taking couch-fainters... as I recall, the article just wrote about SS telling them to kick sand and releasing their own open letter explaining that it turned out that the "infestation of Nazis" accusation was only made on the evidence of 5 Substacks with a combined total of 132 readers, none of whom were paid subscribers. The article then discusses things like how disingenuous the NYT reporter is, that he up and quit SS with his posse, the dangers of "hate speech" and censorship, etc.
Reading the comments, I find your thread talking about SS caving-in.
Maybe I overlooked an update or some replies that explained it. I'd assume that SS eventually decided to ban the supposed Nazis... if so what made them crack/who got to them?
"Maybe I overlooked an update or some replies that explained it. I'd assume that SS eventually decided to ban the supposed Nazis... if so what made them crack/who got to them?"
----------------------------
Now reread this post again. There's no "eventually." It was immediately.
Are you trying to get subscribers mad at the SS owners? You want an apology from them for cutting ties with five 'idiots', possibly plants - friends of Newton's?
I have run across some 'commenters' who I think are trying to 'poison the well'. It doesn't take a whole lot of smarts to make idiotic comments and then point to those comments as 'proof' a 'Stack needs to be censored.
"and antisemitic" - LMAO. They have nothing against Semites (those who speak a Semitic language). Now those Zionists they are definitely against. Anti-Zionist would be the accurate term. Interestingly a lot of them fall into the same category as people like Max Blumenthal and Lee Camp (both Jews). Are Max and Lee "antisemitic"?
It's important to use the correct definition of the word. That is how we communicate. If you don't use the correct definition of the word, nobody is clear on what you mean.
Because it advocates a European invasion of the middle east in one of the last gasp colonial land grabs? Because it advocates ethnic cleansing? Maybe go chat with Lee Camp or Max Blumenthal about it.
If you are up for a bit of reading I'd recommend "Zionism. The real enemy of the Jews" by Alan Hart (Golda Meir's good friend). One rabbi told him "You have summed up the problem for Jews in 7 words".
I doubt you could prove these are DOD bots or Russian bots. Don't be putting ideas into these clowns heads because that is what they will latch onto. Accusing the platform and users of using bots to push alt right propaganda and Fascism.
I can't prove the 2020 election was stolen either. But a LOT of things happened that statistically are extremely, extremely unlikely. Followed by circling the wagons to avoid answering any questions. As was said a million times when Trump was investigated by Mueller/Weisman for colluding with the Russians to steal the election, "if he didn't do anything wrong, what does he have to hide?
I'm not going to just pretend I didn't see this stuff.
They have plenty of creative thinkers dreaming up innovative ways to promote their agitprop. No original ideas are coming from the commenters here.
If anyone did anything to the US election it would have been China, not Russia from my observations. They have far more to gain and a reason to get back at the guy. DT stuck it into them in a big way when he became POTUS and that was a signal for them to get to it and work on keeping him out. They Dems only claimed collusion with the Russians because DT reached out to Putin where as they have been doing the opposite. Its really easy to claim "collusion" when your enemy makes friends with your enemy. Its all part of the game. Unfortunately, you lot are going to the polls again and you can bet there will be even bigger problems this time with mail in ballots, counting machines and more importantly, Dominion systems being involved. We are facing the same problem, Australians don't realise that some states in this country employ those same systems. You vote with a pencil in this country, Those who know better take a a sharpie of ball point pen and use that.
O's second term was also a 'gift'. ERIC boasted in 2021 it 'located' 17 million new voters for the 2020 election, the most in the history of their organization, For comparison, they only found 5.7 million new voters in 2012, Obama's reelection. Did these 'new' voters vote, or were their names used on mail-in-ballots?
this is 5th Gen Warfare. The communists/globo homos/leftists whatever you want to call them can't win without lying, fraud, corruption and psyops. They are dangerous because true believers will stop at nothing. For them there is no morality, ethics or right behavior.
Both sides of the fence are doing the same thing the leftists and conservatives are all running "provocateurs" in forums. Idiots running round in here playing the anti vax card while calling themselves pure blood and clean blood while referring to the vaxxed as sheeple and mudbloods. (Divide and conquer) is a good example. Both sides are engaged in the same tactics. There is no morality in any war, information or kinetic. It is all about who can lie the best and make the other side look worse than your own and try and get others to defect and wake up the sleeping masses with whatever facts we can so they no longer fall under the influence of the Leftist useful idiots.
if there is an organized conservative provocateur effort that would be surprising.
I have seen people referring to themselves as pureblood, which is silly, given that maybe no one can escape the consequences to the blood from various vectors. Mostly what I have seen on line are un injected people being mostly kind and forgiving and trying to at least present their side. Even if they were reviled, hated and threatened early on.
Where I am there was no problem. Want to inject yourself, go ahead weezy. Wear a muzzle, stand six feet away, whatever.
Yes, there is no morality in war unless you consider the just war theory. There are certain things you don't do. The concept of war to the knife and knife to the hilt always has a say depending on the situation.
There are certain things that are true. Things that are not subjective, not opinion and not negotiable. These things are worth supporting and standing for. Even if it is fashionable to think otherwise.
When I saw a use of pureblood it was in reference to never watched TV, I had no idea it was about jabs. Because the jab sheds, there are no purebloods anymore. Hope to never need a transfusion . . .
Yeah, he genuinely looks to me like a guy who’s just about ready to scramble up to the rooftop and start taking pot shots with a deer rifle. I’d honestly steer clear if I saw him loose on the street. He’s dealing with some internal demons for sure.
He does have that insane true believer look. There is no reason or rational thought, only the party and what the party wants is the way for these people.
like Zinoviev in Reds unless I've mixed up the movies.
And also to protect the narrative, without which his ego dies and he becomes nothing in his own mind. He’s created his sense of “self” around the story that the globalist cult leaders have crafted. Destroy that story, and he has no “self” to fall back on. That’s exactly the psychic trap the puppet masters love to ensnare everyone in. There’s no rebellion when the slaves are hypnotized into believing they’re free.
Oh noes, some self-important human that I never heard of and don't care about quit Substack in a public temper tantrum because they won't run their servcce the way he thinks they should!
Whatever shall I do? Read articles, go find a meal and keep on living my best life, I guess.
I find your comment to be without merit as it suggests he has balls of any kind. 😂
In all seriousness, though, I’ve become fascinated by this whole story. I can’t believe we live in a time where “brands of truth” jockey for market shares like brands on mouthwash.
There is an interesting section in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations where he applies the economic principles of a "free market" to the clergy.
Which highlights the reality that we have always lived in "that time" where "brands of truth" compete for market share.
I submit we really want to live in that time. We want to have free and unfettered competition among ideas of all kinds. We want people to challenge us, and perhaps even offend us, so that we can encounter as many "brands" of truth as possible.
How else can we ever hope to learn what "truth" really is?
" To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture."
The false-flag technique for swaying public perception described in Saul Alinsky's (infamous) "Rules for Radicals" comes to mind - that is, dressing up as KKK and appearing in the audience of a targeted adversary.
I sense analogous behavior here.
Also suspect: the invocation of the term "Nazi" - which has become a reflexive cudgel on the part of Antifa (amongst others).
Your average current Antifa street theater useful idiot operative is presumptively blissfully ignorant of the fact that "Nazi" is/was an acronym for "National Socialist." And blissfully ignorant of the fact that Antifa originated in 1930's Germany as the Communist street-thug counterforce to the National Socialists' "brown shirts." It was all an internecine struggle between two forms of Collectivism - Fascists / Communists - as to which would be top-dog in Germany.
But then, the Communists (Lenin?) didn't refer to their blissfully ignorant allies as "useful idiots" for nothing.
I am weary of the predictable public name calling. I despise hearing a person's name introduced with words like, left-leaning, religious right, antisemitic, homophobe, etc. Branding people is a way of smearing, prejudging and belittling a person. The corporate news does routinely when speaking of world leaders or anyone they disagree with. Since the fake Insurrection event of 1/6/2020, we see attempts to eviscerate the first amendment criminalizing freedom of assembly (peaceful gatherings/protest), and free speech.
Collectivists - Communists / Fascists / Socialists / Progressives - always seek to exploit people in desperate circumstances by promising them variations of utopia / "heaven on earth" ("workers paradise" / "thousand year Reich" and so on).
In fact, if the desperate circumstances aren't available, Collectivists through subversion, sabotage and demoralization work to create them. See, e.g., the current activities of the unelected Biden-Harris Junta.
The title "Journalist" is not something to be proud of for most, it commands zero respect. The NYT should call their writers "Opinionists" and they should be required to start all articles with the phrase; "In my opinion......blah, blah, blah".
...following in the footsteps of Walter Duranty, who wrote for the NYT, and lied about Stalin starving the Ukrainians in the 1930s. And he won a Pulitzer for his lies.
"I'm free to speak, and you're free to believe me"
Sounds harsh? Then consider the past 35 years of climate scam perpetrated via journalism. Or that the replacement migration - which started as a UN project in the late 1990s! - is a conspiracy theory.
Journalist simply means "paid liar", nothing more - and it never did mean anything else.
Early 1960s. on the migration. Needed the head start to replace those Eisenhower sent back across the border. Teddy Kennedy bestowed upon the nation the legitimately called "chain migration" law in 1965.
I may not really mean what I say, but I will say it to piss you off. I say it because I can. And until you can calm the fuck down and relax, I will keep saying it, because your over reaction amuses me. You are silly.
Not everything is an existential threat, not to the climate, nor to our so called Democracy, and not everyone is a Nazi or Fascist, and words are not violence.
Saying there only two genders is not a call to genocide, but that is the cliff you lemmings jump off of when faced with opposing ideas, thoughts and opinions.
It's time the hall monitors get shoved back into their lockers.
for the left, what they believe is correct, there is no changing their minds by reason or logic. If they have the opportunity they will kill or put you in a gulag if you don't agree with them.
felonia butthurt has suggested re education camps for the deplorables.
The idiot Newton in that photo is a breed unto itself and besmirching the humble but tasty non binary 'Fig Newtons' by implying the two are related, that is really poor form ole mate. I hope the Fig Newtons demand you are censored from Substack for your "Figgism". I really like Newtons, we Brits call them "Fig Rolls" and they go nicely with a cuppa tea.
Casey Newton? Who cares? Which DIE-infested (so-called academic) indoctrination center does he hail from? Hell! He scribbles for the NYT where all “news” is literally “fit” (as in predigested and regurgitated as if from a mama-bird to her chicks) to print.
Well I do censorship because anything from the mainstream media in any form does not compute into my awareness. If the government is talking, I usually am never listening. I reserve the right to filter out the garbage I do not want coming into my sphere. That includes all woke and most liberal nonsense. The second I see any wokeness on TV, I switch it off. As you can guess, other than older movies, I don't watch much TV.
I have been "xed" out and banned from a few substack sites. Some of these writers cannot accept anything that challenges their supreme arrogance. If I was to write articles for public purview, I wouldn't care who said what. I am offering an opinion, and anyone who does or doesn't agree is fine with me.
I don’t watch tv. This year I’m considering excluding myself completely from politics. I’ve always been involved with politics locally but my little part of heaven on earth is running smoothly with no problems. I’ve decided to stop participating in my local political group for the duration of this year’s federal elections. I also plan to avoid any political articles in my local news sources and my national news sources. I have other activities that I enjoy more and think I have gotten too caught up in following politics.
Cheers to Substack. Time to start looking into these reader numbers. No way he has 174,000 real subscribers, before the hysteria he had little engagement on his posts. Same goes for Katz.
Interesting
Think I struck a nerve with Katz on this topic: https://substack.com/@katz/note/c-47168679?r=12n5dp&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
You go guy!!!!
I got the recipe for the "Doomsday Crackers" off this site a while back. Their site is still up and running and they call them "Survival Crackers".
https://www.newlifeonahomestead.com/survival-crackers/
This what Katz wanted all along Jordan:
https://substack.com/profile/22354262-jwm_in_va/note/c-47131027?r=db4nq
Good riddance to both. Substack doesn’t need these cry babies.
They need to be called what they most assuredly are: unprincipled, controlled garbage.
Bullies! The ones who pushed to the front of the lunch line in grade school and worse!
I disagree. These are the ones who were bullied, afraid of their own shadow, would rather be at the back of the line than get a fat lip from standing up to the bullies. Now, in adulthood and their blue-bubbles they feel somehow important.
I hadn't looked at it that way, and I think you're right about that. I also think they weren't loved as children and that they have dissociative disorder to some degree or another. They're very dangerous.
From the about section of Katz's website:
Jonathan Myerson Katz is a journalist and author who has reported on politics, conflict, human migration, and disasters around the world. His work has appeared in the New York Times and New York Times Magazine, the Atlantic, Foreign Policy, New Republic, New Yorker, Washington Post, Guardian, and elsewhere.
For eight years, Katz was a reporter and editor for the Associated Press.....
Does anyone better epitomize how horrendously propagandist establishment journalism is now?
Stinks of an astroturfed “movement “.
PS: If Biden wins in 2024 Substack will be under enormous pressure to deplatform hysterics like 2nd Smartest Guy in the World. They're already thinking now they can throw a little piece of offal at the howlers and get them to back off.
Anyone who really believes in the sanctity of free speech should be writing to Substack to express disappointment with what they've just done.
If Biden wins then we'll know the election has been rigged.
The Taylor Swift idolators (18 and over) alone probably have it in the bag! That's why you see Swift plastered all over mainstream. They're using her. She's made it very clear she's anti-Trump and all he stands for.
💯‼️
That's not the point.
"hysterics like 2nd Smartest Guy in the World" - hysterics? Can you provide some examples. I love a good hysteria in the morning.
You can do your own research, right?
2nd Smartest Guy might actually be the smartest.
It's an excellent thing that so far at least almost all of us can express our viewpoints freely here on Substack subject of course to the hospitality of individual Substackers.
How could Biden win the election...lol
Keep running Republican idiocy and even that is possible.
I believe they will TRY to steal the election. But that's if we even HAVE an election. That President Trump is wiping the floor with ALL of his challengers so far and showing major voter preference points over Biden should give us pause to remember that the Globalist/ Uniparty/ Deep State can, is already interfering, and will ramp up its interference with the 2024 election for certain.
It occurred to me the hectoring "assassination" question in the Trump appeal was likely a Freudian slip. May Trump's security detail keep him safe.
That's (ominously) called "predictive programming".......
👍
I call Biden the Resident or use no title at all (he deserves worse). I only refer to Pres. D.J. Trump as President. History will show this to be correct.
Stick a fork in Nikki. She's done. Rand Paul cooked her very well.
The military-industrial complex and the espionage-state are all in for that sociopathic bitch!
(edit to change psychopathic to sociopathic)
#NeverNikki
I have long suspected that the NY Times and other mainstream newspapers stay in business by having fake digital subscriptions - the propaganda value is worth it for those willing to pay.
If so, NY Times insider Casey Newton would be aware of it and whatever dark organization fakes digital subscribers to launder money.
I wonder if anyone has brought that to the attention of the PCAOB since the NYT is a publicly traded company.
There are no shortages of govt workers with jobs for life who might subscribe and believe all this propaganda BUT yea, fake subscriptions would help to launder money and make it look organic...
He admitted that the promotion that Substack uses through Notes and having publications recommend other publications readers may want to subscribe to gained him an additional 70,000 readers. He wasn't the least bit thankful for the boost in readers. Instead, he claimed that was a problem because the so called "Nazis" would be boosted, as well. Talk about being ungrateful 😂
Astroturfing...
He looks injected. Has anyone asked about the science that says the vaccine will stop transmission and infection? How did masks do stoping all airborne viruses for the last 20 years including most recently in Japan?
Cheers? They caved and placated because they could afford to throw five idiots out.
Sorry, who did SS cave to and who did they toss out?
What information did you manage to glean from this Substack post?
Alright to satisfy your curiosity (though 99% sure yours is only a rhetorical question) I'll do this from my memory of what I read from this SS rather than re-reading to disambiguate what you indicate is clear:
I thought that the owners of Substack had refused to censor or deplatform the alleged Nazis as was the demand of the NYT journalist and his posse of umbrage-taking couch-fainters... as I recall, the article just wrote about SS telling them to kick sand and releasing their own open letter explaining that it turned out that the "infestation of Nazis" accusation was only made on the evidence of 5 Substacks with a combined total of 132 readers, none of whom were paid subscribers. The article then discusses things like how disingenuous the NYT reporter is, that he up and quit SS with his posse, the dangers of "hate speech" and censorship, etc.
Reading the comments, I find your thread talking about SS caving-in.
Maybe I overlooked an update or some replies that explained it. I'd assume that SS eventually decided to ban the supposed Nazis... if so what made them crack/who got to them?
"Maybe I overlooked an update or some replies that explained it. I'd assume that SS eventually decided to ban the supposed Nazis... if so what made them crack/who got to them?"
----------------------------
Now reread this post again. There's no "eventually." It was immediately.
Are you trying to get subscribers mad at the SS owners? You want an apology from them for cutting ties with five 'idiots', possibly plants - friends of Newton's?
Whatever you say, kid. Whatever you say.
174,000 Alphabet Soup bots is FARRR more likely. I must say, since Israel turned NAZI, no-one else should be slapped with the same label 🏷 🤔
Thx
I have run across some 'commenters' who I think are trying to 'poison the well'. It doesn't take a whole lot of smarts to make idiotic comments and then point to those comments as 'proof' a 'Stack needs to be censored.
and 90% of those idiotic comments, especially the violent or racist ones, are made by paid DOD trolls or bots
You should check out the "bot/troll VS snarky assholes" war in the Zerohedge comments section. It's hilarious. Pretty much any subject will do LOL.
Zerohedge comments were once funny and amusing but are now just snarky and antisemitic.
"and antisemitic" - LMAO. They have nothing against Semites (those who speak a Semitic language). Now those Zionists they are definitely against. Anti-Zionist would be the accurate term. Interestingly a lot of them fall into the same category as people like Max Blumenthal and Lee Camp (both Jews). Are Max and Lee "antisemitic"?
OK. You're showing me how brilliant you are by beating me over the head with the strict definition compared to the every day meaning.
You got me, karen.
It's important to use the correct definition of the word. That is how we communicate. If you don't use the correct definition of the word, nobody is clear on what you mean.
Why would any reasonable person not approve of Zionism?
Because it advocates a European invasion of the middle east in one of the last gasp colonial land grabs? Because it advocates ethnic cleansing? Maybe go chat with Lee Camp or Max Blumenthal about it.
If you are up for a bit of reading I'd recommend "Zionism. The real enemy of the Jews" by Alan Hart (Golda Meir's good friend). One rabbi told him "You have summed up the problem for Jews in 7 words".
Uh cuz it's a religious supremacist political ideology utterly anathematic to the classical liberal values of the West.
I doubt you could prove these are DOD bots or Russian bots. Don't be putting ideas into these clowns heads because that is what they will latch onto. Accusing the platform and users of using bots to push alt right propaganda and Fascism.
I can't prove the 2020 election was stolen either. But a LOT of things happened that statistically are extremely, extremely unlikely. Followed by circling the wagons to avoid answering any questions. As was said a million times when Trump was investigated by Mueller/Weisman for colluding with the Russians to steal the election, "if he didn't do anything wrong, what does he have to hide?
I'm not going to just pretend I didn't see this stuff.
They have plenty of creative thinkers dreaming up innovative ways to promote their agitprop. No original ideas are coming from the commenters here.
If anyone did anything to the US election it would have been China, not Russia from my observations. They have far more to gain and a reason to get back at the guy. DT stuck it into them in a big way when he became POTUS and that was a signal for them to get to it and work on keeping him out. They Dems only claimed collusion with the Russians because DT reached out to Putin where as they have been doing the opposite. Its really easy to claim "collusion" when your enemy makes friends with your enemy. Its all part of the game. Unfortunately, you lot are going to the polls again and you can bet there will be even bigger problems this time with mail in ballots, counting machines and more importantly, Dominion systems being involved. We are facing the same problem, Australians don't realise that some states in this country employ those same systems. You vote with a pencil in this country, Those who know better take a a sharpie of ball point pen and use that.
O's second term was also a 'gift'. ERIC boasted in 2021 it 'located' 17 million new voters for the 2020 election, the most in the history of their organization, For comparison, they only found 5.7 million new voters in 2012, Obama's reelection. Did these 'new' voters vote, or were their names used on mail-in-ballots?
What? You mean that data that’s 48 SDs is unusual?? Or all the data from the election that failed a Benford Analysis. Heh.
I suspect there are "chaos agents" or trolls sent by DoD, DHS, WEF, and the WHO, to make outlandish comments.
this is 5th Gen Warfare. The communists/globo homos/leftists whatever you want to call them can't win without lying, fraud, corruption and psyops. They are dangerous because true believers will stop at nothing. For them there is no morality, ethics or right behavior.
Both sides of the fence are doing the same thing the leftists and conservatives are all running "provocateurs" in forums. Idiots running round in here playing the anti vax card while calling themselves pure blood and clean blood while referring to the vaxxed as sheeple and mudbloods. (Divide and conquer) is a good example. Both sides are engaged in the same tactics. There is no morality in any war, information or kinetic. It is all about who can lie the best and make the other side look worse than your own and try and get others to defect and wake up the sleeping masses with whatever facts we can so they no longer fall under the influence of the Leftist useful idiots.
Both sides are not dong the same thing. One actually used force to force people to do things
if there is an organized conservative provocateur effort that would be surprising.
I have seen people referring to themselves as pureblood, which is silly, given that maybe no one can escape the consequences to the blood from various vectors. Mostly what I have seen on line are un injected people being mostly kind and forgiving and trying to at least present their side. Even if they were reviled, hated and threatened early on.
Where I am there was no problem. Want to inject yourself, go ahead weezy. Wear a muzzle, stand six feet away, whatever.
Yes, there is no morality in war unless you consider the just war theory. There are certain things you don't do. The concept of war to the knife and knife to the hilt always has a say depending on the situation.
There are certain things that are true. Things that are not subjective, not opinion and not negotiable. These things are worth supporting and standing for. Even if it is fashionable to think otherwise.
When I saw a use of pureblood it was in reference to never watched TV, I had no idea it was about jabs. Because the jab sheds, there are no purebloods anymore. Hope to never need a transfusion . . .
not to mention maybe in the air, food and water. Still better not to have taken the death and injury injections.
I am of the opinion that the AI took over a while ago, and that most of what you see on the internet isn’t even real.
Good observation
Hey! Stop talking about me!
Was that idiotic enough? 😉😊😋
What I’ve been thinking too
That monkeypox pic 😂
Yeah, he genuinely looks to me like a guy who’s just about ready to scramble up to the rooftop and start taking pot shots with a deer rifle. I’d honestly steer clear if I saw him loose on the street. He’s dealing with some internal demons for sure.
He does have that insane true believer look. There is no reason or rational thought, only the party and what the party wants is the way for these people.
like Zinoviev in Reds unless I've mixed up the movies.
Hard to tell because he's not double-masked.
To me his expression says it's all just a game and he's playing a role. For attention. For clicks. For kicks. Maybe for bucks, too.
And also to protect the narrative, without which his ego dies and he becomes nothing in his own mind. He’s created his sense of “self” around the story that the globalist cult leaders have crafted. Destroy that story, and he has no “self” to fall back on. That’s exactly the psychic trap the puppet masters love to ensnare everyone in. There’s no rebellion when the slaves are hypnotized into believing they’re free.
...tells me all I need to know about him.
exactly
moral grandstanding from a guy who engages in gay gangbangs
Yea I thought it was illegal to have sex with monkeys right? Maybe not in California.
Oh noes, some self-important human that I never heard of and don't care about quit Substack in a public temper tantrum because they won't run their servcce the way he thinks they should!
Whatever shall I do? Read articles, go find a meal and keep on living my best life, I guess.
Why don't you have a conversation with SCA who thinks life is over because SS owners dumped 5 accounts. Calm SCA down, please.
In other words, he’s taking his ball and going home. What a baby, but his behavior is on par with the other leftist crybabies out there.
I find your comment to be without merit as it suggests he has balls of any kind. 😂
In all seriousness, though, I’ve become fascinated by this whole story. I can’t believe we live in a time where “brands of truth” jockey for market shares like brands on mouthwash.
There is an interesting section in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations where he applies the economic principles of a "free market" to the clergy.
Which highlights the reality that we have always lived in "that time" where "brands of truth" compete for market share.
I submit we really want to live in that time. We want to have free and unfettered competition among ideas of all kinds. We want people to challenge us, and perhaps even offend us, so that we can encounter as many "brands" of truth as possible.
How else can we ever hope to learn what "truth" really is?
An interesting article on the question, 'What is Truth?
In reference to the question by Pontius Pilate in the Gospel of John 18: 33:38 https://www.gotquestions.org/what-is-truth.html
We deal in objective and subjective truth, statistics, lies and damn lies, and propaganda, so we need free speech to sort it all out charitably.
Blubber babies can go home.
We have enough balls left to continue playing. 🤔🤨 I think I said that wrong. 😏
Why not abide to Mr. Newton and the like.
" To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture."
Thomas Paine, The American Crisis
The false-flag technique for swaying public perception described in Saul Alinsky's (infamous) "Rules for Radicals" comes to mind - that is, dressing up as KKK and appearing in the audience of a targeted adversary.
I sense analogous behavior here.
Also suspect: the invocation of the term "Nazi" - which has become a reflexive cudgel on the part of Antifa (amongst others).
Your average current Antifa street theater useful idiot operative is presumptively blissfully ignorant of the fact that "Nazi" is/was an acronym for "National Socialist." And blissfully ignorant of the fact that Antifa originated in 1930's Germany as the Communist street-thug counterforce to the National Socialists' "brown shirts." It was all an internecine struggle between two forms of Collectivism - Fascists / Communists - as to which would be top-dog in Germany.
But then, the Communists (Lenin?) didn't refer to their blissfully ignorant allies as "useful idiots" for nothing.
Well, apparently "Russia!Russia!Russia!", "fascists" and "racist" as epithets have lost their power. "Nazi's!" is next up.... sigh.
I am weary of the predictable public name calling. I despise hearing a person's name introduced with words like, left-leaning, religious right, antisemitic, homophobe, etc. Branding people is a way of smearing, prejudging and belittling a person. The corporate news does routinely when speaking of world leaders or anyone they disagree with. Since the fake Insurrection event of 1/6/2020, we see attempts to eviscerate the first amendment criminalizing freedom of assembly (peaceful gatherings/protest), and free speech.
Stalin.
I suppose. But given Weimar Germany, the rise of the fascists (anti communists) was entirely understandable.
Collectivists - Communists / Fascists / Socialists / Progressives - always seek to exploit people in desperate circumstances by promising them variations of utopia / "heaven on earth" ("workers paradise" / "thousand year Reich" and so on).
In fact, if the desperate circumstances aren't available, Collectivists through subversion, sabotage and demoralization work to create them. See, e.g., the current activities of the unelected Biden-Harris Junta.
NYT journalist quits substack?
IMO, absolutely no lose. . . . save maybe for him
I have not paid attention to the NYT since they 'covered' Vietnam.
I clearly remember their 'coverage' and Washington Post's
and not only shut them down but TIME, NEWSWEEK and network
A pox on them all
"New York Times Journalist" really needs to be understood as a contradiction in terms.
LOL. . .and you are absolutely correct
That can be said about the rest who shovel the same rubbish
which is widespread across MSM
The title "Journalist" is not something to be proud of for most, it commands zero respect. The NYT should call their writers "Opinionists" and they should be required to start all articles with the phrase; "In my opinion......blah, blah, blah".
...following in the footsteps of Walter Duranty, who wrote for the NYT, and lied about Stalin starving the Ukrainians in the 1930s. And he won a Pulitzer for his lies.
I always thought Nazi's believed in censorship. So who's the real Nazi here?
the left has to censor. Otherwise they can't turn America and western Europe into an updated version of 1984.
Read Hitler quotes, without citing him, to your average college goer and they would cheer.
Well, free speech has meant this for journalists:
"I'm free to speak, and you're free to believe me"
Sounds harsh? Then consider the past 35 years of climate scam perpetrated via journalism. Or that the replacement migration - which started as a UN project in the late 1990s! - is a conspiracy theory.
Journalist simply means "paid liar", nothing more - and it never did mean anything else.
Early 1960s. on the migration. Needed the head start to replace those Eisenhower sent back across the border. Teddy Kennedy bestowed upon the nation the legitimately called "chain migration" law in 1965.
Sad.
Here is what I want to tell censoring snowflakes.
I may not really mean what I say, but I will say it to piss you off. I say it because I can. And until you can calm the fuck down and relax, I will keep saying it, because your over reaction amuses me. You are silly.
Not everything is an existential threat, not to the climate, nor to our so called Democracy, and not everyone is a Nazi or Fascist, and words are not violence.
Saying there only two genders is not a call to genocide, but that is the cliff you lemmings jump off of when faced with opposing ideas, thoughts and opinions.
It's time the hall monitors get shoved back into their lockers.
for the left, what they believe is correct, there is no changing their minds by reason or logic. If they have the opportunity they will kill or put you in a gulag if you don't agree with them.
felonia butthurt has suggested re education camps for the deplorables.
Omg Celty this is my truth!!! How to make this post distributed to the widest possible audience....?
Someone with clout needs to move it to notes maybe. No way to restack from this section, and I have very few followers.
I'm glad it resonates with you.
Props to Substack for staying true to their mission of NO censorship of speech or ideas.
moldy fig newton somehow believes he can be pro lethal injection and anti nazi at the same time
The idiot Newton in that photo is a breed unto itself and besmirching the humble but tasty non binary 'Fig Newtons' by implying the two are related, that is really poor form ole mate. I hope the Fig Newtons demand you are censored from Substack for your "Figgism". I really like Newtons, we Brits call them "Fig Rolls" and they go nicely with a cuppa tea.
definitely no relation between newtons and genuine figs! the figgs should know! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkCZbKdppu8
Casey Newton? Who cares? Which DIE-infested (so-called academic) indoctrination center does he hail from? Hell! He scribbles for the NYT where all “news” is literally “fit” (as in predigested and regurgitated as if from a mama-bird to her chicks) to print.
Buh-bye.
Won’t miss what I never saw. 🫣
Did that maniac actually get a frickin monkeypox jab?????
He needed to make the gay community safe!
No he is ensuring the safety of the Monkey population :P
Well I do censorship because anything from the mainstream media in any form does not compute into my awareness. If the government is talking, I usually am never listening. I reserve the right to filter out the garbage I do not want coming into my sphere. That includes all woke and most liberal nonsense. The second I see any wokeness on TV, I switch it off. As you can guess, other than older movies, I don't watch much TV.
I have been "xed" out and banned from a few substack sites. Some of these writers cannot accept anything that challenges their supreme arrogance. If I was to write articles for public purview, I wouldn't care who said what. I am offering an opinion, and anyone who does or doesn't agree is fine with me.
I don’t watch tv. This year I’m considering excluding myself completely from politics. I’ve always been involved with politics locally but my little part of heaven on earth is running smoothly with no problems. I’ve decided to stop participating in my local political group for the duration of this year’s federal elections. I also plan to avoid any political articles in my local news sources and my national news sources. I have other activities that I enjoy more and think I have gotten too caught up in following politics.