Same playbook as before. Notice how they still won't instruct Americans to avoid tobacco (smoking doubles death rates from covid); to get plenty of sunlight and maintain adequate vitamin D levels (nearly 60% of patients hospitalized for covid were vitamin D deficient); or to diet well, exercise, and lose weight (78% of Americans hospitalized for covid were overweight or obese). Nor have they mentioned the importance of zinc in impeding viral infection.
And basically trying to outlaw meat as thousands heal all manner of ills with a carnivore diet. Anything remotely healthy must be removed from the earth
I came to age in late 80's early 90's but have always been drawn to the raw authentic energy of the 70's. That Iggy/Bowie cut I've never seen, thanks for that!
I’m 10 years your junior… had to live through all the hair bands of the 80’s until subpop came along. I’m very lucky my HS daughter is into 90’s music. Tonight here in Oregon we’re going to see Modest Mouse & Pixies (+ Cat Girl) outdoors 👍🏽
And yes, all the tech remastering of old live shows makes me very happy
I know someone who works in the pharmaceutical industry. The ENTIRE industry treats FDA like some kind of Mystery Oracle. They communicate so sporadically, and in such arcane verbiage, that it takes TEAMS of Office Borgs to decode their actual meaning to even just TRY to glimpse their true intention -- and then the Office Borgs hold countless meetings and seminars to try and communicate to one another what FDA *might* actually plan to do.
If you really want to be mind-blown, try looking up DSCSA. That's the regulatory ticking time bomb that literally nobody is talking about outside of the industry -- but which is evidently *THE* BFD for absolutely anyone in pharma right now.
And yet, it’s recommended for everyone, and will be available wholesale for $120 to $130 per dose! What a clown show. Is this another test to see who still remains a sheep?
Published today, Spe. 13, 2023 in Science Translational Medicine (high impact score journal)
At PBS (or youtube) is a 6-hour video of the Sep. 12 CDC AC meeting. Right around 3:00:00 (hour-3) one of the (small) Moderna human trials is described, with findings (n=101; monovalent XBB.1.5 vs. bivalent BA.4/5 + XBB.1.5)
Yes, I won't be getting this jab. And I hope this time around they don't fire people from their jobs for not getting it either, not to mention restrictions on cross border traveling for not being boosted
The global herds of modern moron slaves already declared back in December 2020 that they do not care about safety tests and all that crap. So why waste other animals lives?!
Does this mean these drugs will be effective against upcoming plandemics? Also, Remdesivir is ineffective / dangerous and they have no problems with that
If a drug's ineffectiveness gets it pulled and you need 8 shots which still don't work...
This is actually Codex Alimentarius brought to us by those nice globalists who care so much about us! Dr. Rima Laibow is a good explainer of this monstrosity. It's why vitamins, supplements and homeopathy are being called dangerous and removed from shelves.
The new monovalent Covid shot is still not fully “FDA approved” from what I’ve read, it’s more doubletalk to make you think they’re approved, and the ones targeted are kids are under EUA (despite of the lack of emergency).
This is actually a pretty good comparison (phenylephrine vs covid vaccines). Any pharmacist will tell you phenylephrine is like eating Skittles for your sinus congestion. They will also tell you that they never actually saw anyone buying up mass quantities of pseudoephedrine before the law (or before Breaking Bad haha). Anyways, it all comes down to money... Why do you think they wanted to crack down on hydroxychloroquine? It's cheap and it often works against covid infections.
With phenylephrine off the table, what will they offer next? The pharmacy companies have probably bribed the FDA to allow them to sell Sudafed off the shelf again.
I know 2 people that get horrible sinus issues thanks to allergies and so far, sudafed is the only thing that relieves it. They keep trying things - just won't get the surgery, because 1 -$$$ and 2-the surgery takes out your sense of smell. It is ridiculous that sudafed is still behind the counter, and people have to sign for it.
I have read elsewhere that 80% of the FDA approved RX doesn't work. I think Dr. McCullough has said that. I recall in November 2020 an FDA panel recommended "No" on an Alzheimer's Rx as it had flunked 2 trials for effectiveness. In June 2021, FDA approved it anyway. Aduhelm is priced at $56,000.00 a year for monthly infusions. Three very well credentialed panelists resigned, issuing scathing public statements. It's happened before and has been happening more regularly as we know.
I remember when FDA decided Darvocet doesn't work. Bullshit!
The damn thing about pseudoephedrine (Sudafed) was it was relatively safe (in prescribed doses) to be taken by pregnant women. However, it was replaced by phenylephrine when they moved Sudafed to behind the pharmacy counter, and it sucks to have a less effective and definitely less safe drug for pregnancy. Most people pick up the phenylephrine thinking it is Sudafed.
They should have just required all non-abusable Sudafed (like Nexafed) to be placed like a regular OTC drugs, and reverted Sudafed (abusable) to Rx status.
I agree that Zicam works well, but so well that I used it a lot trying to survive substitute teaching lots of kids of all ages. Over time, I lost my sense of smell and taste but never knew it had anything to do with "safe & effective" Zicam. No warnings on the box. Once I retired, I didn't need it any more. A few years back, I came across information that there was a huge class action suit that was settled by Zicam rather than admit wrongdoing by not having a warning. It stinks not being able to smell or taste properly, so be forewarned.
Same playbook as before. Notice how they still won't instruct Americans to avoid tobacco (smoking doubles death rates from covid); to get plenty of sunlight and maintain adequate vitamin D levels (nearly 60% of patients hospitalized for covid were vitamin D deficient); or to diet well, exercise, and lose weight (78% of Americans hospitalized for covid were overweight or obese). Nor have they mentioned the importance of zinc in impeding viral infection.
https://www.euphoricrecall.net/p/how-fauci-wrecked-the-pandemic-response
And basically trying to outlaw meat as thousands heal all manner of ills with a carnivore diet. Anything remotely healthy must be removed from the earth
Yes. FDA has been pro tobacco for far too long.
Every month I receive generous tobacco coupons in the mail from FDA.
'you can cover up your guts but when you cover up your nuts you're admitting that there must be something wrong'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=530T7f4D0Q0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOQg5AAwRMc
(Fun)
Hey baby we like your lips
(Fun)
Hey baby we like your pants
All aboard for funtime
(Fun)
Hey, I feel lucky tonight
(Fun)
I'm gonna get stoned and run around
All aboard for funtime
(Fun)
Last night I was down in the lab
(Fun)
Talking to Dracula and his crew
All aboard for funtime
(Fun)
I don't need no heavy trips
(Fun)
I just do what I want to do
All aboard for funtime
Or would you prefer, "Straight Outta Compton"?
'girl you thought he was a man but he was a muffin. He hung around till you found out that he didn't know nothin'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGV3yV9q4Q4
I came to age in late 80's early 90's but have always been drawn to the raw authentic energy of the 70's. That Iggy/Bowie cut I've never seen, thanks for that!
Iggy a couple of times- way too loud and kind of bad
Bowie was okay. Never saw Zappa
They've gotten so much better with the sound quality in the last decade (or two)
I’m 10 years your junior… had to live through all the hair bands of the 80’s until subpop came along. I’m very lucky my HS daughter is into 90’s music. Tonight here in Oregon we’re going to see Modest Mouse & Pixies (+ Cat Girl) outdoors 👍🏽
And yes, all the tech remastering of old live shows makes me very happy
Trust no one from the FDA
☠️☠️☠️☠️>>>>FDA
Trust no one in government. Forget trust, but verify with a large dose of skepticism, engage the smell test, the common sense test, and the bs test.
I know someone who works in the pharmaceutical industry. The ENTIRE industry treats FDA like some kind of Mystery Oracle. They communicate so sporadically, and in such arcane verbiage, that it takes TEAMS of Office Borgs to decode their actual meaning to even just TRY to glimpse their true intention -- and then the Office Borgs hold countless meetings and seminars to try and communicate to one another what FDA *might* actually plan to do.
If you really want to be mind-blown, try looking up DSCSA. That's the regulatory ticking time bomb that literally nobody is talking about outside of the industry -- but which is evidently *THE* BFD for absolutely anyone in pharma right now.
Actually, I read this morning, that this new, improved, and latest monovalent booster, wasn't even tested on mice or rats...
And yet, it’s recommended for everyone, and will be available wholesale for $120 to $130 per dose! What a clown show. Is this another test to see who still remains a sheep?
Read again
I did.
Jeff Childers.
Please stop joking. The most cursory search would suffice. You are no "critical thinker" if you take what you're fed without question.
It's been tested in multiple animal models, for safety, and for efficacy outcomes by surrogate markers.
Likewise in humans, though in small numbers (N < 200).
Links for the multiple trials?!
I could paste and I might, when I get home.
These data are summarized in the publicly available AC briefing documents, press releases, at CDC and FDA - basically, sources you would not accept.
Company and CDC briefing documents for this meeting are here - transcript should be up shortly;
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/agenda-archive/agenda-2023-09-12-508.pdf
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/slides-2023-09-12.html
Here's a blurb from New Scientist with mention of "multiple clinical studies"
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2392035-modernas-improved-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-is-effective-at-lower-doses/
Rodent model: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adf4100
Published today, Spe. 13, 2023 in Science Translational Medicine (high impact score journal)
At PBS (or youtube) is a 6-hour video of the Sep. 12 CDC AC meeting. Right around 3:00:00 (hour-3) one of the (small) Moderna human trials is described, with findings (n=101; monovalent XBB.1.5 vs. bivalent BA.4/5 + XBB.1.5)
Here is an early human safety study:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.22281050v1
Animal studies are not "clinical trials."
If you bother to read anything from the above links, you will see that the "Has never been studied" contention is ... not honest.
And if you don't want it, don't get.
Those weren't for me... I've read plenty!
"Animal studies are not "trials."", of course they are...
Yes, I won't be getting this jab. And I hope this time around they don't fire people from their jobs for not getting it either, not to mention restrictions on cross border traveling for not being boosted
The global herds of modern moron slaves already declared back in December 2020 that they do not care about safety tests and all that crap. So why waste other animals lives?!
Does this mean these drugs will be effective against upcoming plandemics? Also, Remdesivir is ineffective / dangerous and they have no problems with that
Bingo. Root cause discovered
If a drug's ineffectiveness gets it pulled and you need 8 shots which still don't work...
This is actually Codex Alimentarius brought to us by those nice globalists who care so much about us! Dr. Rima Laibow is a good explainer of this monstrosity. It's why vitamins, supplements and homeopathy are being called dangerous and removed from shelves.
The new monovalent Covid shot is still not fully “FDA approved” from what I’ve read, it’s more doubletalk to make you think they’re approved, and the ones targeted are kids are under EUA (despite of the lack of emergency).
I think the EUA is active in 6 month increments. The Brandon administration keeps extending it.
I read the minors got an EUA but the approval for adults is something else.
Yes, so strange; I was thinking this myself when I read the news. Perhaps it's integral to their plan to demonize all sniffles.
This is actually a pretty good comparison (phenylephrine vs covid vaccines). Any pharmacist will tell you phenylephrine is like eating Skittles for your sinus congestion. They will also tell you that they never actually saw anyone buying up mass quantities of pseudoephedrine before the law (or before Breaking Bad haha). Anyways, it all comes down to money... Why do you think they wanted to crack down on hydroxychloroquine? It's cheap and it often works against covid infections.
With phenylephrine off the table, what will they offer next? The pharmacy companies have probably bribed the FDA to allow them to sell Sudafed off the shelf again.
I know 2 people that get horrible sinus issues thanks to allergies and so far, sudafed is the only thing that relieves it. They keep trying things - just won't get the surgery, because 1 -$$$ and 2-the surgery takes out your sense of smell. It is ridiculous that sudafed is still behind the counter, and people have to sign for it.
I have read elsewhere that 80% of the FDA approved RX doesn't work. I think Dr. McCullough has said that. I recall in November 2020 an FDA panel recommended "No" on an Alzheimer's Rx as it had flunked 2 trials for effectiveness. In June 2021, FDA approved it anyway. Aduhelm is priced at $56,000.00 a year for monthly infusions. Three very well credentialed panelists resigned, issuing scathing public statements. It's happened before and has been happening more regularly as we know.
I remember when FDA decided Darvocet doesn't work. Bullshit!
Purebloods
TIME TO DEFUND FDA.
TIME TO RESTRICT THEIR POWER.
LONG PAST TiME>
Don’t know why anyone would question the official narratives what with the success of the War On Drugs. 🙈
Name checks out
You mean FDA only tested it on politicians and FDA NIH bureaucrats?? 😂😂👍 🐁 🐀
The damn thing about pseudoephedrine (Sudafed) was it was relatively safe (in prescribed doses) to be taken by pregnant women. However, it was replaced by phenylephrine when they moved Sudafed to behind the pharmacy counter, and it sucks to have a less effective and definitely less safe drug for pregnancy. Most people pick up the phenylephrine thinking it is Sudafed.
They should have just required all non-abusable Sudafed (like Nexafed) to be placed like a regular OTC drugs, and reverted Sudafed (abusable) to Rx status.
What is the ingredient in Zicam nasal spray? That stuff really works. Or maybe most/all drugs are just placebos. Who knows for sure.
I like Xclear.
I agree that Zicam works well, but so well that I used it a lot trying to survive substitute teaching lots of kids of all ages. Over time, I lost my sense of smell and taste but never knew it had anything to do with "safe & effective" Zicam. No warnings on the box. Once I retired, I didn't need it any more. A few years back, I came across information that there was a huge class action suit that was settled by Zicam rather than admit wrongdoing by not having a warning. It stinks not being able to smell or taste properly, so be forewarned.
Have you tried the neti pot? I used to get many sinus infections. It works great and only saline solution
It's so simple.
phenylephrine = good
pseudoephedrine = really good
amphetamine nasal spray = super good (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levomethamphetamine)
paxlovid = really bad
ventilators = really, really bad
remdesivir - super bad
"covid vaccine" (any) = super horrifically bad
mRNA = death clots in a syringe
You can’t make this stuff up... smh.