74 Comments
User's avatar
Brad's avatar

Same playbook as before. Notice how they still won't instruct Americans to avoid tobacco (smoking doubles death rates from covid); to get plenty of sunlight and maintain adequate vitamin D levels (nearly 60% of patients hospitalized for covid were vitamin D deficient); or to diet well, exercise, and lose weight (78% of Americans hospitalized for covid were overweight or obese). Nor have they mentioned the importance of zinc in impeding viral infection.

https://www.euphoricrecall.net/p/how-fauci-wrecked-the-pandemic-response

Expand full comment
Chiadrum's avatar

And basically trying to outlaw meat as thousands heal all manner of ills with a carnivore diet. Anything remotely healthy must be removed from the earth

Expand full comment
Free Radical's avatar

Yes. FDA has been pro tobacco for far too long.

Every month I receive generous tobacco coupons in the mail from FDA.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Sep 13, 2023Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Free Radical's avatar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOQg5AAwRMc

(Fun)

Hey baby we like your lips

(Fun)

Hey baby we like your pants

All aboard for funtime

(Fun)

Hey, I feel lucky tonight

(Fun)

I'm gonna get stoned and run around

All aboard for funtime

(Fun)

Last night I was down in the lab

(Fun)

Talking to Dracula and his crew

All aboard for funtime

(Fun)

I don't need no heavy trips

(Fun)

I just do what I want to do

All aboard for funtime

Or would you prefer, "Straight Outta Compton"?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Sep 13, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Free Radical's avatar

Iggy a couple of times- way too loud and kind of bad

Bowie was okay. Never saw Zappa

They've gotten so much better with the sound quality in the last decade (or two)

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Sep 13, 2023Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment
GLowe's avatar

Trust no one from the FDA

Expand full comment
Renee Marie's avatar

☠️☠️☠️☠️>>>>FDA

Expand full comment
Angk's avatar

Trust no one in government. Forget trust, but verify with a large dose of skepticism, engage the smell test, the common sense test, and the bs test.

Expand full comment
Doctor Kitt's avatar

I know someone who works in the pharmaceutical industry. The ENTIRE industry treats FDA like some kind of Mystery Oracle. They communicate so sporadically, and in such arcane verbiage, that it takes TEAMS of Office Borgs to decode their actual meaning to even just TRY to glimpse their true intention -- and then the Office Borgs hold countless meetings and seminars to try and communicate to one another what FDA *might* actually plan to do.

If you really want to be mind-blown, try looking up DSCSA. That's the regulatory ticking time bomb that literally nobody is talking about outside of the industry -- but which is evidently *THE* BFD for absolutely anyone in pharma right now.

Expand full comment
Indrek Sarapuu's avatar

Actually, I read this morning, that this new, improved, and latest monovalent booster, wasn't even tested on mice or rats...

Expand full comment
Free Radical's avatar

Read again

Expand full comment
Indrek Sarapuu's avatar

I did.

Jeff Childers.

Expand full comment
Free Radical's avatar

Please stop joking. The most cursory search would suffice. You are no "critical thinker" if you take what you're fed without question.

It's been tested in multiple animal models, for safety, and for efficacy outcomes by surrogate markers.

Likewise in humans, though in small numbers (N < 200).

Expand full comment
voza0db's avatar

Links for the multiple trials?!

Expand full comment
Free Radical's avatar

I could paste and I might, when I get home.

These data are summarized in the publicly available AC briefing documents, press releases, at CDC and FDA - basically, sources you would not accept.

Company and CDC briefing documents for this meeting are here - transcript should be up shortly;

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/agenda-archive/agenda-2023-09-12-508.pdf

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/slides-2023-09-12.html

Here's a blurb from New Scientist with mention of "multiple clinical studies"

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2392035-modernas-improved-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-is-effective-at-lower-doses/

Rodent model: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adf4100

Published today, Spe. 13, 2023 in Science Translational Medicine (high impact score journal)

At PBS (or youtube) is a 6-hour video of the Sep. 12 CDC AC meeting. Right around 3:00:00 (hour-3) one of the (small) Moderna human trials is described, with findings (n=101; monovalent XBB.1.5 vs. bivalent BA.4/5 + XBB.1.5)

Here is an early human safety study:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.22281050v1

Animal studies are not "clinical trials."

If you bother to read anything from the above links, you will see that the "Has never been studied" contention is ... not honest.

And if you don't want it, don't get.

Expand full comment
voza0db's avatar

Those weren't for me... I've read plenty!

"Animal studies are not "trials."", of course they are...

Expand full comment
voza0db's avatar

The global herds of modern moron slaves already declared back in December 2020 that they do not care about safety tests and all that crap. So why waste other animals lives?!

Expand full comment
R3000's avatar

Does this mean these drugs will be effective against upcoming plandemics? Also, Remdesivir is ineffective / dangerous and they have no problems with that

Expand full comment
Chiadrum's avatar

Bingo. Root cause discovered

Expand full comment
Jill's avatar

If a drug's ineffectiveness gets it pulled and you need 8 shots which still don't work...

This is actually Codex Alimentarius brought to us by those nice globalists who care so much about us! Dr. Rima Laibow is a good explainer of this monstrosity. It's why vitamins, supplements and homeopathy are being called dangerous and removed from shelves.

Expand full comment
Formerly_Known_As_Someone's avatar

The new monovalent Covid shot is still not fully “FDA approved” from what I’ve read, it’s more doubletalk to make you think they’re approved, and the ones targeted are kids are under EUA (despite of the lack of emergency).

Expand full comment
Nicola's avatar

I think the EUA is active in 6 month increments. The Brandon administration keeps extending it.

Expand full comment
Formerly_Known_As_Someone's avatar

I read the minors got an EUA but the approval for adults is something else.

Expand full comment
frett's avatar

This is actually a pretty good comparison (phenylephrine vs covid vaccines). Any pharmacist will tell you phenylephrine is like eating Skittles for your sinus congestion. They will also tell you that they never actually saw anyone buying up mass quantities of pseudoephedrine before the law (or before Breaking Bad haha). Anyways, it all comes down to money... Why do you think they wanted to crack down on hydroxychloroquine? It's cheap and it often works against covid infections.

With phenylephrine off the table, what will they offer next? The pharmacy companies have probably bribed the FDA to allow them to sell Sudafed off the shelf again.

Expand full comment
Potatodots's avatar

I know 2 people that get horrible sinus issues thanks to allergies and so far, sudafed is the only thing that relieves it. They keep trying things - just won't get the surgery, because 1 -$$$ and 2-the surgery takes out your sense of smell. It is ridiculous that sudafed is still behind the counter, and people have to sign for it.

I have read elsewhere that 80% of the FDA approved RX doesn't work. I think Dr. McCullough has said that. I recall in November 2020 an FDA panel recommended "No" on an Alzheimer's Rx as it had flunked 2 trials for effectiveness. In June 2021, FDA approved it anyway. Aduhelm is priced at $56,000.00 a year for monthly infusions. Three very well credentialed panelists resigned, issuing scathing public statements. It's happened before and has been happening more regularly as we know.

I remember when FDA decided Darvocet doesn't work. Bullshit!

Expand full comment
John Rice's avatar

Purebloods

Expand full comment
Duchess's avatar

TIME TO DEFUND FDA.

TIME TO RESTRICT THEIR POWER.

LONG PAST TiME>

Expand full comment
Bezoar's avatar

Don’t know why anyone would question the official narratives what with the success of the War On Drugs. 🙈

Expand full comment
Free Radical's avatar

Name checks out

Expand full comment
Vince Gallo's avatar

You mean FDA only tested it on politicians and FDA NIH bureaucrats?? 😂😂👍 🐁 🐀

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

The damn thing about pseudoephedrine (Sudafed) was it was relatively safe (in prescribed doses) to be taken by pregnant women. However, it was replaced by phenylephrine when they moved Sudafed to behind the pharmacy counter, and it sucks to have a less effective and definitely less safe drug for pregnancy. Most people pick up the phenylephrine thinking it is Sudafed.

They should have just required all non-abusable Sudafed (like Nexafed) to be placed like a regular OTC drugs, and reverted Sudafed (abusable) to Rx status.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

What is the ingredient in Zicam nasal spray? That stuff really works. Or maybe most/all drugs are just placebos. Who knows for sure.

Expand full comment
Rosalind McGill's avatar

I like Xclear.

Expand full comment
Susan Remer's avatar

I agree that Zicam works well, but so well that I used it a lot trying to survive substitute teaching lots of kids of all ages. Over time, I lost my sense of smell and taste but never knew it had anything to do with "safe & effective" Zicam. No warnings on the box. Once I retired, I didn't need it any more. A few years back, I came across information that there was a huge class action suit that was settled by Zicam rather than admit wrongdoing by not having a warning. It stinks not being able to smell or taste properly, so be forewarned.

Expand full comment
Nicola's avatar

Have you tried the neti pot? I used to get many sinus infections. It works great and only saline solution

Expand full comment
Free Radical's avatar

It's so simple.

phenylephrine = good

pseudoephedrine = really good

amphetamine nasal spray = super good (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levomethamphetamine)

paxlovid = really bad

ventilators = really, really bad

remdesivir - super bad

"covid vaccine" (any) = super horrifically bad

mRNA = death clots in a syringe

Expand full comment
Allison Gilliland's avatar

You can’t make this stuff up... smh.

Expand full comment
Renee Green's avatar

So what they're saying is, look, we are here to do something, but nothing useful.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

🙌 But, does any government agency do anything useful?

Expand full comment