Published today, Spe. 13, 2023 in Science Translational Medicine (high impact score journal)
At PBS (or youtube) is a 6-hour video of the Sep. 12 CDC AC meeting. Right around 3:00:00 (hour-3) one of the (small) Moderna human trials is described, with findings (n=101; monovalent XBB.1.5 vs. bivalent BA.4/5 + XBB.1.5)
The basic contention that so many eagerly spew is a lie; "Actually, I read this morning, that this new, improved, and latest monovalent booster, wasn't even tested on mice or rats..."
ItтАЩs their own fault. Millions of people know that they have been lied to by the Government about the Covid vaccine safety issues..... and that many people have been made sick and died from these vaccines.
No one with half a brain is going to take the boosters or believe anything said by public тАШhealthтАЩ officials ever again.
Please stop joking. The most cursory search would suffice. You are no "critical thinker" if you take what you're fed without question.
It's been tested in multiple animal models, for safety, and for efficacy outcomes by surrogate markers.
Likewise in humans, though in small numbers (N < 200).
Links for the multiple trials?!
I could paste and I might, when I get home.
These data are summarized in the publicly available AC briefing documents, press releases, at CDC and FDA - basically, sources you would not accept.
Company and CDC briefing documents for this meeting are here - transcript should be up shortly;
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/agenda-archive/agenda-2023-09-12-508.pdf
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/slides-2023-09-12.html
Here's a blurb from New Scientist with mention of "multiple clinical studies"
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2392035-modernas-improved-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-is-effective-at-lower-doses/
Rodent model: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adf4100
Published today, Spe. 13, 2023 in Science Translational Medicine (high impact score journal)
At PBS (or youtube) is a 6-hour video of the Sep. 12 CDC AC meeting. Right around 3:00:00 (hour-3) one of the (small) Moderna human trials is described, with findings (n=101; monovalent XBB.1.5 vs. bivalent BA.4/5 + XBB.1.5)
Here is an early human safety study:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.18.22281050v1
Animal studies are not "clinical trials."
If you bother to read anything from the above links, you will see that the "Has never been studied" contention is ... not honest.
And if you don't want it, don't get.
Those weren't for me... I've read plenty!
"Animal studies are not "trials."", of course they are...
I doubt that.
The basic contention that so many eagerly spew is a lie; "Actually, I read this morning, that this new, improved, and latest monovalent booster, wasn't even tested on mice or rats..."
Couldn't care less...
Then why ask?
You're trolling for LULZ. - I muted and blocked you yesterday but your drivel continues to appear.
stool will be stool
ItтАЩs their own fault. Millions of people know that they have been lied to by the Government about the Covid vaccine safety issues..... and that many people have been made sick and died from these vaccines.
No one with half a brain is going to take the boosters or believe anything said by public тАШhealthтАЩ officials ever again.
And for good reason......