i am not sure where you got such a clear idea about my belief and understanding, taking comments away from their contexts, creating a strawman, and then fallaciously using it to attack someone you do not know. Ad hominum attacks are the sign of poor thinking. Maybe you should direct your apparent vendetta somewhere else; my guess is th…
i am not sure where you got such a clear idea about my belief and understanding, taking comments away from their contexts, creating a strawman, and then fallaciously using it to attack someone you do not know. Ad hominum attacks are the sign of poor thinking. Maybe you should direct your apparent vendetta somewhere else; my guess is that you will be unable to contain yourself and will snipe back…
"fascism!" You are repeating the slur you have been told by the Left to use. That's what I know about you. "ad hominem attacks are the sign of poor thinking," clever. But you lack knowledge of real political history and repeat the leftist propaganda words used by cuckservative media. Admit it instead of pretending you're not - you have no arguments as you know that's what you're doing. "apparent vendetta" Again, clever! Except I'm giving you information considered forbidden in the media you're used to, and that's what you don't like. "be unable to contain yourself" Like you? Nothing you say is built on any facts but you refuse to admit that. Maybe you should stop reading cuck sites and using the false arguments they teach you, which a lot of the time is meant to keep you from learning anything deeper. Read Revolver News, American Renaissance, Information Liberation and Unz Review instead. @harmlessyarddog on Twitter, and those he retweets. And if that's too radical, there are even leftist writers that are better than cuck sites: @mtracey and @mrandyngo and @ggreenwald on Twitter. I prefer those who at least give useful information instead of the neocon-loving sphere funded by types like the Mercers. I'm pretty sure you've never read about the financiers and what their agenda is.
I've concluded you're an unstable person who has no facts and don't even try to present any. Very sad. Keep repeating the Left's propaganda word "fascism" like a good cuckservative. You are completely unable to answer any facts I bring up about actual "fascism" which opposed the leftists you call "fascist". Sad. You are controlled by cuck media.
By the way, still waiting for any actual arguments from you Kelly, and not just insults. But I know you didn't even read what I wrote, mustn't read information that isn't what you're used to from your fave media. Typical for someone who uses the Left's talking points.
Um, what media do you read? Obviously only mainstream leftist media and neocon-controlled "right-wing" media. You don't read VDARE or any other "racist" media, I'm sure. "You portray smarter than all" I, at least, know English grammar. I don't "portray smarter than all," I present facts, ones which you obviously are unable to reply to, just like Kelly here. Instead you use slurs and arrogant language. Name a single fact I bring up about actual historical, anti-leftist fascist movements, that is wrong? Then explain why it would be correct to use "fascist!" against leftists that support Antifa? Except to obey the Left's dictate that "anything you don't like must be called fascist". Very obedient.
Seems like making a simple Bing search for the term was not an option. (Though maybe you prefer Google.) The word cuckservative has been around at least since 2015, but not among those who only stick to mainstream-approved media. Here is some reading, but note, it's not from the WSJ.
Thanks for the edubication, you seem very smart AND Likable. Probably a good dinner companion. You project alot though and that is always a warning sign to me that your last friend was furry and had four legs. Anyhoo, I will power up my duck duck go or Brave and look into it. Stay away from sharp objects buddy. And hey, good to see Substack and Jordan in this case fall to the Neo Cons, man that was quick. WOW.
i am not sure where you got such a clear idea about my belief and understanding, taking comments away from their contexts, creating a strawman, and then fallaciously using it to attack someone you do not know. Ad hominum attacks are the sign of poor thinking. Maybe you should direct your apparent vendetta somewhere else; my guess is that you will be unable to contain yourself and will snipe back…
"fascism!" You are repeating the slur you have been told by the Left to use. That's what I know about you. "ad hominem attacks are the sign of poor thinking," clever. But you lack knowledge of real political history and repeat the leftist propaganda words used by cuckservative media. Admit it instead of pretending you're not - you have no arguments as you know that's what you're doing. "apparent vendetta" Again, clever! Except I'm giving you information considered forbidden in the media you're used to, and that's what you don't like. "be unable to contain yourself" Like you? Nothing you say is built on any facts but you refuse to admit that. Maybe you should stop reading cuck sites and using the false arguments they teach you, which a lot of the time is meant to keep you from learning anything deeper. Read Revolver News, American Renaissance, Information Liberation and Unz Review instead. @harmlessyarddog on Twitter, and those he retweets. And if that's too radical, there are even leftist writers that are better than cuck sites: @mtracey and @mrandyngo and @ggreenwald on Twitter. I prefer those who at least give useful information instead of the neocon-loving sphere funded by types like the Mercers. I'm pretty sure you've never read about the financiers and what their agenda is.
I’ve concluded your an unstable person.
I've concluded you're an unstable person who has no facts and don't even try to present any. Very sad. Keep repeating the Left's propaganda word "fascism" like a good cuckservative. You are completely unable to answer any facts I bring up about actual "fascism" which opposed the leftists you call "fascist". Sad. You are controlled by cuck media.
By the way, still waiting for any actual arguments from you Kelly, and not just insults. But I know you didn't even read what I wrote, mustn't read information that isn't what you're used to from your fave media. Typical for someone who uses the Left's talking points.
Oh, and one more thing: Don't call those who finance and support Antifa "fascists". But again I'm sure you don't know what I'm talking about.
“Cuckservativs”, “cuck”? Help me Tell, what the F is that? You portray smarter than all, please fill me in.
Um, what media do you read? Obviously only mainstream leftist media and neocon-controlled "right-wing" media. You don't read VDARE or any other "racist" media, I'm sure. "You portray smarter than all" I, at least, know English grammar. I don't "portray smarter than all," I present facts, ones which you obviously are unable to reply to, just like Kelly here. Instead you use slurs and arrogant language. Name a single fact I bring up about actual historical, anti-leftist fascist movements, that is wrong? Then explain why it would be correct to use "fascist!" against leftists that support Antifa? Except to obey the Left's dictate that "anything you don't like must be called fascist". Very obedient.
Seems like making a simple Bing search for the term was not an option. (Though maybe you prefer Google.) The word cuckservative has been around at least since 2015, but not among those who only stick to mainstream-approved media. Here is some reading, but note, it's not from the WSJ.
https://www.returnofkings.com/68170/10-signs-you-might-be-a-cuckservative
https://www.amren.com/news/2015/07/what-is-a-cuckservative/
Beware, that last site is "racist," i.e. posts facts you shouldn't know about, and all links to it are banned from Twitter, so we know it's not good.
Thanks for the edubication, you seem very smart AND Likable. Probably a good dinner companion. You project alot though and that is always a warning sign to me that your last friend was furry and had four legs. Anyhoo, I will power up my duck duck go or Brave and look into it. Stay away from sharp objects buddy. And hey, good to see Substack and Jordan in this case fall to the Neo Cons, man that was quick. WOW.