Then the shots should immediately be withdrawn, if not then a BIG warning label should come with the shots. Patients should be required to sign a consent form acknowledging that they received and understood the potential danger before accepting the vaccination
Did the agencies approving the jab know? (They may not have, initially, but I'd put that as 50/50 at best.)
And from whom should those injured seek reparations and damages?
I hope there are people in multippe jurisdictions able and willing to take this to the courts, if only to create a paper-trail and make it common knowledge.
Ian Miller's latest substack today brings up an Ohio State study showing that the covid vaccines likely don't even minimize covid deaths, the last redoubt for mRNA advocates. Worth a read:
The question is: now what? What will we do next? What will we do now that we know that our government allowed dangerous pharmaceuticals to be forced to the population?
Vaccines do not prevent viral illnesses. They suppress the natural detoxification system, allowing the body to accumulate toxicity instead of facilitating the elimination of toxins. This is due to the presence of man-made viruses, animal tissue/fetal tissue, chemical adjuvants, in these concoctions, none of which belong in the bloodstream or tissues. NOT natural….and will have to come out someday in the form of sickness, disease, death… 😢 all the while the cartel makes buttloads of money…
I would think they feel a need to make it look as if they're on the "up and up" when truth be told they most likely knew this all along; but that isn't something that a great many of us wouldn't have already suspected.
I don't think they count anything that doesn't knock you acutely out of action.... My retina aneurysms don't count even though related.. most incidents aren't detected for 4-18 months due to annual exams... Chronic Diseases show up in eyes first
“This leads uninformed consumers to conduct an improper risk-benefit analysis, because there is no evidence that the shots prevent infection”.
Preventing infection is only one of many possible benefits. A fact you surely know but strangely omitted. Yes they weren’t giving people enough information to do the proper risk-benefit analysis. Why would you chose to be like them and frame the discussion this way?
That finding is a bit of a smoke screen, typically they have taken advantage of people's ignorance of their rules. When they say this vaccine "Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2)" is a direct cause. They do not mean the rest of the vaccine variants that have been made since and those new models for want of a better description despite containing mRNA are not even considered as having a problem.
Then the shots should immediately be withdrawn, if not then a BIG warning label should come with the shots. Patients should be required to sign a consent form acknowledging that they received and understood the potential danger before accepting the vaccination
Did the manufacturers know? (I think they did.)
Did the agencies approving the jab know? (They may not have, initially, but I'd put that as 50/50 at best.)
And from whom should those injured seek reparations and damages?
I hope there are people in multippe jurisdictions able and willing to take this to the courts, if only to create a paper-trail and make it common knowledge.
And that's exactly why the CDC is pushing mRNA injection number 9 or 10. The CDC is still in murder mode. Don't be fooled.
Ian Miller's latest substack today brings up an Ohio State study showing that the covid vaccines likely don't even minimize covid deaths, the last redoubt for mRNA advocates. Worth a read:
https://ianmsc.substack.com/p/exactly-how-effective-are-covid-vaccines
The question is: now what? What will we do next? What will we do now that we know that our government allowed dangerous pharmaceuticals to be forced to the population?
https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/september-11th-and-menticide
I'm surprised that they even reached a conclusion.
What a shame this will not be reported where a large majority of vax proponents get their news…
This is always what the data said, which is why they banned everybody who repeated the data.
Vaccines do not prevent viral illnesses. They suppress the natural detoxification system, allowing the body to accumulate toxicity instead of facilitating the elimination of toxins. This is due to the presence of man-made viruses, animal tissue/fetal tissue, chemical adjuvants, in these concoctions, none of which belong in the bloodstream or tissues. NOT natural….and will have to come out someday in the form of sickness, disease, death… 😢 all the while the cartel makes buttloads of money…
I would think they feel a need to make it look as if they're on the "up and up" when truth be told they most likely knew this all along; but that isn't something that a great many of us wouldn't have already suspected.
I don't think they count anything that doesn't knock you acutely out of action.... My retina aneurysms don't count even though related.. most incidents aren't detected for 4-18 months due to annual exams... Chronic Diseases show up in eyes first
https://www.dossier.today/p/the-10-stages-of-mrna-denial/comment/54237452?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1s4gol
“This leads uninformed consumers to conduct an improper risk-benefit analysis, because there is no evidence that the shots prevent infection”.
Preventing infection is only one of many possible benefits. A fact you surely know but strangely omitted. Yes they weren’t giving people enough information to do the proper risk-benefit analysis. Why would you chose to be like them and frame the discussion this way?
That finding is a bit of a smoke screen, typically they have taken advantage of people's ignorance of their rules. When they say this vaccine "Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2)" is a direct cause. They do not mean the rest of the vaccine variants that have been made since and those new models for want of a better description despite containing mRNA are not even considered as having a problem.