Yes, adverse reactions due to 'spikeopathy'. The virus doesn't have a dangerous lipid nanoparticle, and it does not have a pseudo uridine insert. And the shot can result in frame shifting leading to harmful protein manufacture. 'Way too many lacked the discernment to say 'no' to an experimental shot....' That is the crux of it. Yes, there was the threat of job loss, and people had families to feed, however, if everyone had refused, it would have blown over and people would have kept their jobs or been reinstated quickly because businesses could not survive a total mutiny. The people had the power but instead surrendered it, making it difficult for all. The fact that Pfizer wanted a 75 year wait period, is a sure inference of malfeasance. How much brazenness does it take for people to stop being docile. I mean they actually sacrificed their children to the experiment; it does not get worse than that.
Not seeing that particular article, there are a bunch of other ones.
Yes, adverse reactions due to 'spikeopathy'. The virus doesn't have a dangerous lipid nanoparticle, and it does not have a pseudo uridine insert. And the shot can result in frame shifting leading to harmful protein manufacture. 'Way too many lacked the discernment to say 'no' to an experimental shot....' That is the crux of it. Yes, there was the threat of job loss, and people had families to feed, however, if everyone had refused, it would have blown over and people would have kept their jobs or been reinstated quickly because businesses could not survive a total mutiny. The people had the power but instead surrendered it, making it difficult for all. The fact that Pfizer wanted a 75 year wait period, is a sure inference of malfeasance. How much brazenness does it take for people to stop being docile. I mean they actually sacrificed their children to the experiment; it does not get worse than that.