14 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
A.'s avatar

Thank you. Yes, I mention that somewhere in the posts below.

Expand full comment
Carl L. McWilliams's avatar

As you know, the Preamble to the 1776 Declaration of Independence illuminates that all “governments receive their just powers from the consent of the governed”. Thus the controversy of voting, (or not), in the 2024 presidential election, has its roots in our founding document. And by voting in November you are giving your consent to be governed by those who were approved by the majority of the voters, to assume the powers of government.

That said, do you remember that time in 2016 when Attorney General Loretta Lynch decided she would take a private meeting with Bill Clinton on her plane as it was parked on the tarmac in Phoenix – while Bill’s wife, Hillary Clinton (when she was Obama’s Secretary of State), was under federal investigation for using a secret and unlawful private email server at her New York home, to receive thousands of top secret and classified government emails?

With the obvious corruption of the Phoenix tarmac meeting in mind; it is my humble opinion that our Constitutional Republic permanently fell during the 2016 presidential election cycle on July 5 when FBI Director James Comey ignored the rule of law and “exonerated” Hillary Clinton for the illegal server and the thousands of her classified emails. At that point in American history, the “rule of law” in the USA began its demise and because the constitutional provisions for remedy to the ensuing felonious acts and omissions (think FISA Court - “Crossfire Hurricane”) of James Comey, (et al) were never pursued; our Constitutional Republic has fallen and is irreparable…... and the 2022 FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago along with the four unconstitutional indictments of Donald J. Trump and the “Bragg show trial in New York”, is my proof We the People now live in a banana republic.

Please be cognizant: The Comey/Hillary Clinton exoneration was three weeks prior to a July 2016 Oval Office meeting orchestrated by President Barack Hussein Obama and Valerie Jarrett and attended by Vice President Joe Biden, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, national security adviser Susan Rice and CIA Director John Brennan.

According to CIA Director John Brennan’s handwritten notes, Brennan informed attendees of “alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016, of “a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.” In other words, a scandal about collusion with Russia. According to a CIA memo, the intent of this plan was “distracting the public from her use of a private email server.”

Later it was shown that the plan was enacted via the Steele dossier, which Robby Mook, Clinton’s former campaign director, acknowledged under oath in 2022 to have procured. So explosive were Brennan’s notes that U.S. senators needed a federal court order, issued four years after Obama’s Oval Office meeting, to wrest a copy of it from the Department of Justice. Released along with Brennan’s notes was a copy of a CIA memo sent to FBI Director James Comey and Peter Strzok, (the deputy assistant director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division and manager of FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane”), delineating the Barack Hussein Obama’s Oval Office meeting’s discussion.

Therefore as We the People encounter the 2024 election cycle, it is wise to conduct yourselves as living is a “Post-Constitutional Republic”. I compare it to living in Roman occupied Jerusalem at the time of Jesus Christ.

Expand full comment
A.'s avatar

Carl, you are obviously well-tutored on your topic. I take my hat off to you. You are going to have me going through those details all evening. I need to see this as you do. Thank you again for the material.

You are better than I am at grasping the minutiae of government procedure. I am good at the psychological/Pavlovian/Evolutionary Science angle of this, which is how and why I see behind the masks. We must pay attention to one another's posts. You provide one side (as you wish)...I will provide the other (in post-able chunks, in limits).

This is becoming most interesting, my friend. Do continue putting all of your puzzle pieces together, because some of these SOBs -- though they are manipulative -- are not terribly bright. They will slip-up somewhere.

America is not going to go down this easily.

Expand full comment
Carl L. McWilliams's avatar

Did you know the United Nations is planning to seize “global emergency powers" with President Joe Biden’s and Vice-President Kamala Harris' support?

It's true. Under a shocking new plan that is scheduled to be adopted two months before the U.S. presidential election in 2024, all it would take is some sort of a major “global shock”, for immediately enabling the United Nations to literally take political authority over the entire planet. A July 4 article (link below) in The Federalist first broke the story. Unfortunately the mainstream/Pravda media in the United States is not covering this at all, so most people have absolutely no idea this is going on. To many readers this may sound like a conspiracy theory, but this is actually what is being proposed, and the Biden administration is fully behind this insidious plan.

Next month, (September 2024), UN global representatives will gather for “the Summit of the Future”, and during that conference UN member states are scheduled to officially ratify a “Pact for the Future”. Once enacted, the “Pact for the Future” grants global powers to the U.N. plan for a new “emergency platform” - a stunning proposal to give the U.N. significant powers in the event of future “global shocks,” such as; “major climatic event,” “future pandemic risks,” a “global digital connectivity disruption,” “major event in outer space,” and generic “unforeseen risks”, (‘black swan’ events).”

The proposal is the biggest attempted power grab in the history of the United Nations. If allowed by Biden/Harris/Obama, the sovereignty of the United States and the inalienable rights guaranteed in the US Constitution would cease to exist:

(That is probably their plan, surrender the US sovereignty to the New World Order)

https://thefederalist.com/2023/07/04/the-u-n-is-planning-to-seize-global-emergency-powers-with-bidens-support/

Expand full comment
A.'s avatar

I do believe this is a possibility, Carl. The WHO have already been up to similar tricks, and the whole theme of power-grabbing in recent years has been built around so-called crises and the supposed need for grabbing power at those times.

It's wearing a bit thin now and I think larger numbers of people are beginning to awaken. They have seen it before, and they are smelling a rat. The Globalist overdid the crisis dramas.....I don't think may folks paid attention to the supposed Monkeypox pandemic announced last week, And many of the other scams are falling through. It was over-used. And began to have low credibility. Not too may people are so unintelligent that they don't eventually detect the pattern and question it.

James Lindsay of New Discourses is very good on the UN material. Julian Huxley and his crowd. A sub-human deluded bunch. Time to let them eat each other, and the rest of us can re-build.

Expand full comment
Deborah Gregson's avatar

I've been aware of this for several months due to medical substack writers who have reported on WHO, the UN, and the planning for future pandemics. Britain, and Europe are already planning for new pandemics; the NEJM and UCSF have written numerous articles about pandemic compliance, pandemic planning, and how to reframe mandate phrasing to get people to "better understand why they must comply".

The people who plan for global government have been planning a long time and perhaps Trump slowed the progress (hopefully, he will again). But their plans will continue to be an evil that must be resisted for a long time. For now, having a place where we can discuss our knowledge, share truth, educate others, is the best hope we have of resistance.

Expand full comment
A.'s avatar

Thanks, Deborah. During COVID Mania, there were several writers hinting at this or outright warning of it.

I recall reading "The Price of Panic" by Axe/Briggs/Rchards early in that game -- some good data and other relevant facts which could not be ignored.

Expand full comment
John R. Grout's avatar

You are as nuts as A.

Expand full comment
John R. Grout's avatar

You are raving.

Expand full comment
wilson's avatar

well written. I've said the same, just not nearly as well. It always fell on deaf ears.

Expand full comment
A.'s avatar

It usually falls on deaf ears for some time, Wilson. I play the canary in the coalmine too, and meet blank faces quite often.

Expand full comment
John R. Grout's avatar

That’s because you are throwing in irrelevancies and trying to resolve old grudges. Catholics like the Polish Pope hate Protestants as much as the Provisional IRA did in Ireland. He wants to conquer them instead of Islam, which knows no bounds on its ambition. He couldn’t see that because he knew no bounds on his ambition. We have to put the ultra-right-wing religions into the same category as terrorist organizations like the HAMAS.

Expand full comment
A.'s avatar

👎

Expand full comment