''We were, however, unable to scrutinize Gay’s results because she would not release her dataset to us (personal communication with Claudine Gay, 2002).''
Or in plain language: shie lied and plagiarised because being a diversity-hire, she isn't good enough, cannot make herself be good enough and knows she will never be - and feels entitled to it all anyway.
This is what participation trophies, relativist tests and exams and "everyone is of equal dignity and worth" leads to when implemented.
Don’t forget the “everyone is special” canard, LOL. No, actually Little Susie is likely just average. Or there would be no such thing as “average.” Or a Bell Curve.
There are certainly brilliant black people, like Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas (both of whom are hated by DEI proponents) but exalting, and then exposing, DEI hires (formerly the now quaint “Affirmative Action hire”) like Gay sets back black scholarship. Well, until Zuckerberg and Twitter “fact checker” PhDs living in Mom’s basement just scrub the exposés...
Yah. That one is really horrible if you think about it.
It makes being average, aka normal, into something bad or undesirable, something simply not "good enough" - small wonder young people (i.e. anyone under 40) have such poor mental health when they've been raised on a diet of "You're special".
As I used to tell my students:
"Don't try to be Zlatan (a football player); there can be only one Zlatan and that spot is taken. Be all /you/ can be, and then improve on that."
This I used as an intro on a mini-lecture/debate on normal(ity) & average and what the words really mean. Students appreciated it no matter their politics; younger colleagues not so much.
Gay's lack of integrity (plagiarism) and corrupted scientific methodology clearly indicate an inability or willingness to "dig deep". The academy hypocrisy is so well displayed. Perhaps this is the hinge factor that may lead to the long needed elimination of tenure?
Is it really hypocrisy or them not really giving a shit if their discrepancies are showing? In their absolute arrogance, they think their marxist takeover is a done deal and there's nothing American citizens can do about it.
A Rebuttal to Misinformation and Prejudice in Military and Political Discourse:
The statement presented is rife with offensive language, misinformation, and biased viewpoints that lack an evidence-based perspective on the U.S. military and political climate. It is essential to address these points with a factual and respectful approach.
Diversity in the U.S. Military: The portrayal of the U.S. military's racial composition is skewed and fails to acknowledge the diverse and inclusive nature of the armed forces. The U.S. military is an institution that prides itself on its diversity, representing a cross-section of American society. People of different races, ethnicities, and backgrounds serve honorably, reflecting the nation's diversity.
Respect for Leadership: The derogatory language used against U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin is unacceptable and undermines the dignity of an individual who has dedicated his life to serving his country. Secretary Austin's confirmation by a 93-2 vote in the Senate is a testament to his qualifications and the respect he commands across the political spectrum. His efforts to address issues like racism in the military should be approached with an open mind rather than dismissed with prejudice.
Recruitment Efforts: The claim about the U.S. Army's recruitment ads is misleading. Military recruitment campaigns aim to reach a broad and diverse audience, reflecting the inclusive values of the service. These efforts should be viewed as strengthening the armed forces by bringing in a variety of perspectives and skills.
Misrepresentation of Political Figures: The statements regarding political figures are filled with disrespectful and offensive language, devoid of constructive criticism or factual basis. Political discourse should be grounded in respect, even in disagreement. Using derogatory terms to describe leaders contributes nothing to meaningful conversation and only serves to deepen division.
Misconceptions of War and Defense: The assertion that Americans are universally opposed to foreign wars oversimplifies a complex issue. While there is a valid debate over foreign interventions, it's inaccurate to claim unanimous opposition. The U.S. has a volunteer military, and those who serve do so for various personal and patriotic reasons.
Baseless Conspiracy Theories: The references to "Zionist ass-whores" and "devil worshipping fags" are not only deeply offensive but also represent a dangerous and unfounded conspiracy theory mindset. Such language has no place in rational discourse and only serves to propagate hate and division.
The Role of Guns in American Society: The claim regarding Americans being "armed to the teeth" and ready for internal conflict is an extreme viewpoint that doesn't represent the majority. While the right to bear arms is a constitutional right, most Americans advocate for responsible gun ownership and peaceful resolution of conflicts.
In conclusion, it's vital to approach discussions about the military, political leadership, and national defense with a foundation of respect, factual accuracy, and a commitment to constructive dialogue. Reducing complex issues to offensive stereotypes and conspiracy theories serves no purpose other than to deepen misunderstandings and animosity. A more informed and respectful discourse is necessary for the progress and unity of any society.
Sadly, she doesn’t care that she’s been caught plagiarizing. Why? Because she thinks she’s owed her position. She deserves to be president of Harvard just for being who she is... a black woman propped up by white people because it makes them FEEL better. It’s all about how someone feels. That’s the problem we all face now. People voting, hiring, protesting for terrorists, etc. based on how they feel. We are doomed because white people protesting white people for being white people is absolutely insane.
Agreed! DEI is just anti-Whiteness! Our White children are taught they were 'born racists' in public schools, anti-White events have become socially acceptable, simply saying, 'It's okay to be White' is labeled 'hate-speech', etc., yet this so-called 'White privilege' supposedly is the cause of 'oppression'. The reason for all the anti-jews is protestors believe jews are just White Gentiles (whom they've been groomed to loathe today) and society needs to start waking up to this. When professors publicly call for 'White genocide', it's ignored and schools even defend their profs, yet anti-semitism gets worldwide attention.
😆😆😆 Well, that's certainly original. Oh no, wait. You said that already, too. How many fingers am I holding up, droid? You say six, cuz AI is bad at replicating hands. 😆😆😆
I lost interest in pursuing a higher ed degree after watching a scantily dressed younger girl received her doctorate degree in a jiffy.
Her Secret to Success? She had spent most of her time in different male professors' offices. Also, for her dissertation, she just copied right out of borrowed books from the library! Right in front of rest of us.
The fact that she was tenured with four papers (one of which was debunked) tells you all you need to know about her - a diversity hire from the get-go.
I think her case is a symptom of the systemic rot in higher education. Gaining tenure bases on merit is an anachronism. Todays old boy network replaces well connected men with well connected “diversity hires”.
Two wrongs don’t make a right. Plus Affirmative Action racial discrimination was enacted in the 1960s. We have had 60 years of institutional racial discrimination against white men
Claudine Gay is an entitled, privileged, pseudo intellectual, Marxist apparatchik. Only the party goals matter to this kind of civic criminal. She operates from the Bolsheviks play book ffs!
Claudine Gay deserves to be subjected to the Marx/Engels manifesto of envious hatred, and schizophrenic social madness. Let an angry mob teach her about 'social justice'.
Thank you for commenting on my sub thread. You nailed it.
The Frankfurt School - the original circle-jerk, ego-masturbation, echo chamber of psychotic delusions of grandeur.
Anna Freud, and her nephew Edward Bernays should have been aborted - Marx/Engels as well.
But we cannot condemn "Jews" for the evils of Zionism/Bolshevism/Islam and all the offspring cults of the Abrahamic mythos cluster-fuck. Jews are Caucasians ffs, no matter how hard they try to convince the world they're special through psychological operations, acts of terrorism , and endless war.
It may have worked to bring about the fall of Rome, but like you said... Here in the United States of America - the citizens are the Army they cannot defeat... And many of us are of Norse/Russ ancestry and not even the Roman Legions could defeat us.
So in the end, it is all related: the bad climate data, the bad race data, the bad vaccine data. We live in a culture of lies, and no amount of worship of purely materialist Evolution of the species is going to build a culture in which we do not to lie to each other for advantage. Evolution teaches taking competitive advantage of other humans. You cannot devise a fitness limit, though many try. Points to Ms. Gay for seeing this game for what it is and playing it so well. Should she not be imitated?
It is bad enough when people rise to prominence and success on the backs of others' work, but it is even worse, by orders of magnitude, when others who know about the fraud go to such lengths as people seem to have gone to protect the person who committed the fraud. And this protection racket seems to have been operating on her behalf for quite some time, certainly not only since her Congressional testimony. People should be ashamed of themselves, but they won't be.
This is the most interesting part to the story. Who is coaching her and covering for her and WHY? What is their motive of muddying the waters and obscuring the truth? More Satanistic Inversion games again?
The American Political Science Review is the flagship journal in her field. You might ask the editors for her data; they will likely demur. But that’s the protocol in academe. The sad fact is that many, many regression studies in the social sciences cannot be replicated. That’s why the American Economic Review asks authors to submit their data; it’s always a great discipline to submit the data and concomitant conclusion computer code with the original manuscript.
Thus, from Claudine Gay’s point of view, her methods are no different from those of mediocre white male professor. So many scholars mine the data and report fragile regression results. Most of those mediocre white male academics of course would not get tenure at Stanford. The ineluctable conclusion follows. That’s the real reason she won’t give out her data.
Hello, friend. We had the Internet in 1984 including file transfer protocol (ftp) introduced in 1971, USEnet for discussions introduced 1980, email messaging introduced in familiar form by 1978 with precursors to 1965. We were also big on releasing the data. Information wants to be free.
Or in plain language: shie lied and plagiarised because being a diversity-hire, she isn't good enough, cannot make herself be good enough and knows she will never be - and feels entitled to it all anyway.
This is what participation trophies, relativist tests and exams and "everyone is of equal dignity and worth" leads to when implemented.
Don’t forget the “everyone is special” canard, LOL. No, actually Little Susie is likely just average. Or there would be no such thing as “average.” Or a Bell Curve.
There are certainly brilliant black people, like Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas (both of whom are hated by DEI proponents) but exalting, and then exposing, DEI hires (formerly the now quaint “Affirmative Action hire”) like Gay sets back black scholarship. Well, until Zuckerberg and Twitter “fact checker” PhDs living in Mom’s basement just scrub the exposés...
Yah. That one is really horrible if you think about it.
It makes being average, aka normal, into something bad or undesirable, something simply not "good enough" - small wonder young people (i.e. anyone under 40) have such poor mental health when they've been raised on a diet of "You're special".
As I used to tell my students:
"Don't try to be Zlatan (a football player); there can be only one Zlatan and that spot is taken. Be all /you/ can be, and then improve on that."
This I used as an intro on a mini-lecture/debate on normal(ity) & average and what the words really mean. Students appreciated it no matter their politics; younger colleagues not so much.
no she can still do a comeback. you cant say that if she really dug deep she could come up with something good
Gay's lack of integrity (plagiarism) and corrupted scientific methodology clearly indicate an inability or willingness to "dig deep". The academy hypocrisy is so well displayed. Perhaps this is the hinge factor that may lead to the long needed elimination of tenure?
Is it really hypocrisy or them not really giving a shit if their discrepancies are showing? In their absolute arrogance, they think their marxist takeover is a done deal and there's nothing American citizens can do about it.
A Rebuttal to Misinformation and Prejudice in Military and Political Discourse:
The statement presented is rife with offensive language, misinformation, and biased viewpoints that lack an evidence-based perspective on the U.S. military and political climate. It is essential to address these points with a factual and respectful approach.
Diversity in the U.S. Military: The portrayal of the U.S. military's racial composition is skewed and fails to acknowledge the diverse and inclusive nature of the armed forces. The U.S. military is an institution that prides itself on its diversity, representing a cross-section of American society. People of different races, ethnicities, and backgrounds serve honorably, reflecting the nation's diversity.
Respect for Leadership: The derogatory language used against U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin is unacceptable and undermines the dignity of an individual who has dedicated his life to serving his country. Secretary Austin's confirmation by a 93-2 vote in the Senate is a testament to his qualifications and the respect he commands across the political spectrum. His efforts to address issues like racism in the military should be approached with an open mind rather than dismissed with prejudice.
Recruitment Efforts: The claim about the U.S. Army's recruitment ads is misleading. Military recruitment campaigns aim to reach a broad and diverse audience, reflecting the inclusive values of the service. These efforts should be viewed as strengthening the armed forces by bringing in a variety of perspectives and skills.
Misrepresentation of Political Figures: The statements regarding political figures are filled with disrespectful and offensive language, devoid of constructive criticism or factual basis. Political discourse should be grounded in respect, even in disagreement. Using derogatory terms to describe leaders contributes nothing to meaningful conversation and only serves to deepen division.
Misconceptions of War and Defense: The assertion that Americans are universally opposed to foreign wars oversimplifies a complex issue. While there is a valid debate over foreign interventions, it's inaccurate to claim unanimous opposition. The U.S. has a volunteer military, and those who serve do so for various personal and patriotic reasons.
Baseless Conspiracy Theories: The references to "Zionist ass-whores" and "devil worshipping fags" are not only deeply offensive but also represent a dangerous and unfounded conspiracy theory mindset. Such language has no place in rational discourse and only serves to propagate hate and division.
The Role of Guns in American Society: The claim regarding Americans being "armed to the teeth" and ready for internal conflict is an extreme viewpoint that doesn't represent the majority. While the right to bear arms is a constitutional right, most Americans advocate for responsible gun ownership and peaceful resolution of conflicts.
In conclusion, it's vital to approach discussions about the military, political leadership, and national defense with a foundation of respect, factual accuracy, and a commitment to constructive dialogue. Reducing complex issues to offensive stereotypes and conspiracy theories serves no purpose other than to deepen misunderstandings and animosity. A more informed and respectful discourse is necessary for the progress and unity of any society.
You’re disgusting. Your language is vile.
Don't bother. I think it's some sort of AI tool. It just keeps repeating the same things over and over.
Your points may be correct. But you blatant bias obscures them, making your reply more about you than about Gays behavior. Shape up.
I think he thought he was on bitchute.
It's a shame Substack doesn't have killfiles, like in the old Usenet days.
Get back into your mothers basement or your tunnel you distrusting slime bucket.
Sadly, she doesn’t care that she’s been caught plagiarizing. Why? Because she thinks she’s owed her position. She deserves to be president of Harvard just for being who she is... a black woman propped up by white people because it makes them FEEL better. It’s all about how someone feels. That’s the problem we all face now. People voting, hiring, protesting for terrorists, etc. based on how they feel. We are doomed because white people protesting white people for being white people is absolutely insane.
Agreed! DEI is just anti-Whiteness! Our White children are taught they were 'born racists' in public schools, anti-White events have become socially acceptable, simply saying, 'It's okay to be White' is labeled 'hate-speech', etc., yet this so-called 'White privilege' supposedly is the cause of 'oppression'. The reason for all the anti-jews is protestors believe jews are just White Gentiles (whom they've been groomed to loathe today) and society needs to start waking up to this. When professors publicly call for 'White genocide', it's ignored and schools even defend their profs, yet anti-semitism gets worldwide attention.
This will be the third time you've posted this. Nobody cares the first time you said it, nobody cares now.
He seems to be posting it all over, repeating the same comments on other articles as well. I consider it a provocation
He's gotta be non-human. He never posts original material and keeps repeating the same things. It started out offensive, now it's amusing.
Bot alert. Let's see the response
You need new material.
😆😆😆 Well, that's certainly original. Oh no, wait. You said that already, too. How many fingers am I holding up, droid? You say six, cuz AI is bad at replicating hands. 😆😆😆
Not surprising ... another “diversity hire” with no experience ... keep exposing the “Claudine Gay’s” (aka, FRAUDS)
Fresh Harvard hoodie designs just dropped: https://substack.com/@yuribezmenov/note/c-45941896?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=j3a7
DEI Fraud.
I lost interest in pursuing a higher ed degree after watching a scantily dressed younger girl received her doctorate degree in a jiffy.
Her Secret to Success? She had spent most of her time in different male professors' offices. Also, for her dissertation, she just copied right out of borrowed books from the library! Right in front of rest of us.
She was continually promoted for reasons other than her supposed scholarship. She’s likely not alone.
The fact that she was tenured with four papers (one of which was debunked) tells you all you need to know about her - a diversity hire from the get-go.
Four papers in academia is NOTHING
I think her case is a symptom of the systemic rot in higher education. Gaining tenure bases on merit is an anachronism. Todays old boy network replaces well connected men with well connected “diversity hires”.
Two wrongs don’t make a right. Plus Affirmative Action racial discrimination was enacted in the 1960s. We have had 60 years of institutional racial discrimination against white men
Claudine Gay is an entitled, privileged, pseudo intellectual, Marxist apparatchik. Only the party goals matter to this kind of civic criminal. She operates from the Bolsheviks play book ffs!
Claudine Gay deserves to be subjected to the Marx/Engels manifesto of envious hatred, and schizophrenic social madness. Let an angry mob teach her about 'social justice'.
"The things that make you hmmmmmm"
Thank you for commenting on my sub thread. You nailed it.
The Frankfurt School - the original circle-jerk, ego-masturbation, echo chamber of psychotic delusions of grandeur.
Anna Freud, and her nephew Edward Bernays should have been aborted - Marx/Engels as well.
But we cannot condemn "Jews" for the evils of Zionism/Bolshevism/Islam and all the offspring cults of the Abrahamic mythos cluster-fuck. Jews are Caucasians ffs, no matter how hard they try to convince the world they're special through psychological operations, acts of terrorism , and endless war.
It may have worked to bring about the fall of Rome, but like you said... Here in the United States of America - the citizens are the Army they cannot defeat... And many of us are of Norse/Russ ancestry and not even the Roman Legions could defeat us.
OIG
She has no talent or ability...
What’s she supposed to do?
If you can’t do, teach
If you can’t teach- Administration
So in the end, it is all related: the bad climate data, the bad race data, the bad vaccine data. We live in a culture of lies, and no amount of worship of purely materialist Evolution of the species is going to build a culture in which we do not to lie to each other for advantage. Evolution teaches taking competitive advantage of other humans. You cannot devise a fitness limit, though many try. Points to Ms. Gay for seeing this game for what it is and playing it so well. Should she not be imitated?
Reptile.
Try again Nazi.
She’s an entitled charlatan.
It is bad enough when people rise to prominence and success on the backs of others' work, but it is even worse, by orders of magnitude, when others who know about the fraud go to such lengths as people seem to have gone to protect the person who committed the fraud. And this protection racket seems to have been operating on her behalf for quite some time, certainly not only since her Congressional testimony. People should be ashamed of themselves, but they won't be.
This is the most interesting part to the story. Who is coaching her and covering for her and WHY? What is their motive of muddying the waters and obscuring the truth? More Satanistic Inversion games again?
Obama. The destruction that is being inflicted on the US is his doing, too.
The American Political Science Review is the flagship journal in her field. You might ask the editors for her data; they will likely demur. But that’s the protocol in academe. The sad fact is that many, many regression studies in the social sciences cannot be replicated. That’s why the American Economic Review asks authors to submit their data; it’s always a great discipline to submit the data and concomitant conclusion computer code with the original manuscript.
Thus, from Claudine Gay’s point of view, her methods are no different from those of mediocre white male professor. So many scholars mine the data and report fragile regression results. Most of those mediocre white male academics of course would not get tenure at Stanford. The ineluctable conclusion follows. That’s the real reason she won’t give out her data.
Hello, friend. We had the Internet in 1984 including file transfer protocol (ftp) introduced in 1971, USEnet for discussions introduced 1980, email messaging introduced in familiar form by 1978 with precursors to 1965. We were also big on releasing the data. Information wants to be free.
Harvard in Wonderland: Incuriouser and incuriouser.