Interesting.
Much appreciate you taking the time to explain.
Are these "your" ideas, or based on another/other philosophy? (which is somewhat of a loaded question, as I don't really believe much is truly "new" but more constructed from either previous ideas or convergences of previous ideas, though those previous ideas can be reconstruct…
Are these "your" ideas, or based on another/other philosophy? (which is somewhat of a loaded question, as I don't really believe much is truly "new" but more constructed from either previous ideas or convergences of previous ideas, though those previous ideas can be reconstructed to form revised conceptualizations of those ideas).
But I ask because I'm interested in exploring this more.
Regardless, I hope you write.
I rarely encounter people with the abilities for such abstraction, critical thought, etc. you've demonstrated herein.
And the world needs to be exposed to more of this.
Most people think they think, but way too few truly think to this type of contemplation. They most often "think" merely within the bounds & constraints of contrived "norms", teachings, customs, and such.
I mentioned Petrarch previously, and he sought to restore the "philosophizing" of the classical figures, often criticizing the trivialities & superficialities of the "scholastic movement" of his day.
The world again needs more deep thought & deep questioning.
"The current resort to bypass rational thought process by a 'politics' of manipulative incentivisation, targets these 'feelings' which are hopes and fears relative to an already divided and conflicted sense of self, life and world. In so doing it reveals that what passed as rational thought process was in fact part of a masking,"
I often wonder how long these "'politics' of manipulative incentivisation" have been present & ongoing?
Though many might proclaim they are relatively recent developments (perhaps hundreds or thousands of years), I ponder whether the concept of human "consciousness" is founded/rooted in such.
It seems to me too many people think humans have lived & learned, but I feel perhaps they have instead succumbed to greater manipulations, exponentially building upon themselves. Leading those humans far from "natural" existence.
Like humans themselves are some sort of GMO creation and/or experiment.
In the course of my life I have acquired an articulation. I have also released my own mind as a means of prising truth to let it serve as an instrument to self-revealing truth. So in that sense the mind follows or serves the question and answer of the heart instead of running ahead in its own spin.
This can be called thinking in the heart, for it is where a question is refined, often to reveal answer by a more direct question rather than stating the problem in the form of a question that defines what the answers must be to be accepted.
My desire is to extend invitation to recognise from a resonance rather than via translation back into old wine bottles. I also feel a reintegrative function that is growing the quality of such recognition by extending it as my witness to others.
And trust that my freedom to be as I am moved will serve others in their own, rather than to 'follow' or agree.
As for what the world needs...?
I feel a need for release of old baggage such as to allow or open a renewal. The old self-limiting patterns go back to the most ancient of days, but time is not what it seems.
I see a reversal in consciousness such that what we have called conscious is a seemingly split off dissociation running in place of full awareness, and set as if over and apart from life judged, yet suffering to be subject to the world it has in a sense made by such rules and filters.
I don't know that I have my own ideas so much as my own recognisable qualities or signature vibration that we all have and by which we are recognisably ourselves. I have only what I have received, but in willingness to extend the receipt is my own giving and receiving. In contrast to 'share' what we haven't really accepted or integrated as if to wake everyone else up is our function is to never open the quality of presence that is truly shared.
The exploration of experience is different from an 'experiment' in the way we are currently engaged in treating Life and suffering to be so treated; both. Living is transformative. But we never actually become what we are not, regardless the fear made real to the mind by reaction.
Interesting.
Much appreciate you taking the time to explain.
Are these "your" ideas, or based on another/other philosophy? (which is somewhat of a loaded question, as I don't really believe much is truly "new" but more constructed from either previous ideas or convergences of previous ideas, though those previous ideas can be reconstructed to form revised conceptualizations of those ideas).
But I ask because I'm interested in exploring this more.
Regardless, I hope you write.
I rarely encounter people with the abilities for such abstraction, critical thought, etc. you've demonstrated herein.
And the world needs to be exposed to more of this.
Most people think they think, but way too few truly think to this type of contemplation. They most often "think" merely within the bounds & constraints of contrived "norms", teachings, customs, and such.
I mentioned Petrarch previously, and he sought to restore the "philosophizing" of the classical figures, often criticizing the trivialities & superficialities of the "scholastic movement" of his day.
The world again needs more deep thought & deep questioning.
"The current resort to bypass rational thought process by a 'politics' of manipulative incentivisation, targets these 'feelings' which are hopes and fears relative to an already divided and conflicted sense of self, life and world. In so doing it reveals that what passed as rational thought process was in fact part of a masking,"
I often wonder how long these "'politics' of manipulative incentivisation" have been present & ongoing?
Though many might proclaim they are relatively recent developments (perhaps hundreds or thousands of years), I ponder whether the concept of human "consciousness" is founded/rooted in such.
It seems to me too many people think humans have lived & learned, but I feel perhaps they have instead succumbed to greater manipulations, exponentially building upon themselves. Leading those humans far from "natural" existence.
Like humans themselves are some sort of GMO creation and/or experiment.
In the course of my life I have acquired an articulation. I have also released my own mind as a means of prising truth to let it serve as an instrument to self-revealing truth. So in that sense the mind follows or serves the question and answer of the heart instead of running ahead in its own spin.
This can be called thinking in the heart, for it is where a question is refined, often to reveal answer by a more direct question rather than stating the problem in the form of a question that defines what the answers must be to be accepted.
I put some of my writing on
http://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.co.uk/
My desire is to extend invitation to recognise from a resonance rather than via translation back into old wine bottles. I also feel a reintegrative function that is growing the quality of such recognition by extending it as my witness to others.
And trust that my freedom to be as I am moved will serve others in their own, rather than to 'follow' or agree.
As for what the world needs...?
I feel a need for release of old baggage such as to allow or open a renewal. The old self-limiting patterns go back to the most ancient of days, but time is not what it seems.
I see a reversal in consciousness such that what we have called conscious is a seemingly split off dissociation running in place of full awareness, and set as if over and apart from life judged, yet suffering to be subject to the world it has in a sense made by such rules and filters.
I don't know that I have my own ideas so much as my own recognisable qualities or signature vibration that we all have and by which we are recognisably ourselves. I have only what I have received, but in willingness to extend the receipt is my own giving and receiving. In contrast to 'share' what we haven't really accepted or integrated as if to wake everyone else up is our function is to never open the quality of presence that is truly shared.
The exploration of experience is different from an 'experiment' in the way we are currently engaged in treating Life and suffering to be so treated; both. Living is transformative. But we never actually become what we are not, regardless the fear made real to the mind by reaction.
I could have said 'world made real by reaction'.
Look at the time of covid!