The Atlantic commits journalistic malpractice with anti-Trump 'October surprise' hit piece
Complete and total hackery.
On Tuesday afternoon, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published an anonymously sourced hit piece that claimed President Trump had spoken fondly of Adolf Hitler. The story is laughable propaganda and absurd on its face. It’s just another indication that the corporate media is continually destroying what’s left of its credibility, and that Democrats are going to lose badly in two week’s time.
Here’s the Too long; didn't read (TL;DR) version for those who can’t stomach the thought of reading more garbage from the legacy media:
Check out The Dossier’s amazing sponsors, curated exclusively for our readers.
When incredibly valuable assets come up for sale, it's typically the wealthiest people that end up taking home an amazing investment. But not always…
One platform is taking on the billionaires at their own game, buying up and securitizing some of the most prized blue-chip artworks for its investors.
It's called Masterworks. Their nearly $1 billion collection includes works by greats like Banksy, Picasso, and Basquiat. When Masterworks sells a painting – like the 23 it's already sold – investors reap their portion of the net proceeds.
Now, you can skip the waitlist with OUR EXCLUSIVE LINK.
_The content is not intended to provide legal, tax, or investment advice._ _No money is being solicited or will be accepted until the offering statement for a particular offering has been qualified by the SEC. Offers may be revoked at any time. Contacting Masterworks involves no commitment or obligation. _ _Contemporary art data based on repeat-sales index of historical Post-War & Contemporary Art market prices from 1995 to 2023, developed by Masterworks. There are significant limitations to comparative asset class data. Indices are unmanaged and a Masterworks investor cannot invest directly in an index. _ _“Net Annualized Return” refers to the annualized internal rate of return, or IRR, net of all fees and costs, to holders of Class A shares from the primary offering, calculated from the final closing date of such offering to the date the sale is consummated. A more detailed breakdown of the Net Annualized Return calculation for each issuer can be found in the respective Form 1-U for each exit. The 3 median returns above represent the ones closest in percentage to the median of the 12 exits with holding periods over 1 year._ _Net proceeds distributed back represents the total liquidation proceeds distributed back to investors, net of all fees, expenses and proceeds reinvested in Masterworks offerings, of all works Masterworks has exited to date._ _See important Reg A disclosures at [masterworks.com/cd](http://masterworks.com/cd)._
Trump is depicted as an angry, racist, bitter cheapskate who declared, “I need the kind of generals that Hitler had,” adding, “People who were totally loyal to him, that follow orders.”
Everyone who commented publicly on the story and who was said to be in the room with the president at the time of this alleged statement has said the story is entirely made up and that the president never said those words.
Goldberg’s sources are anonymous, described as “two people who heard him say this.”
Now, you’re going to read tons of hot takes on the piece itself, righteously stressing the utter hackery of a Democrat operative publishing an “October surprise” with made-up nonsense to help Kamala Harris. That’s certainly true. The good news for the Trump campaign is that The Atlantic and its legacy media allies don’t have the sway they used to. A decade ago, a legacy media hit piece would have much more staying power. Today, it’s widely mocked by sane people as nothing but deception, though it will surely be circulated among the Blue Anons to confirm their lunatic worldview.
But more importantly, for a man heralded as a seasoned and serious journalist, Goldberg has committed journalistic malpractice of the highest order.
The Goldberg story has a big tell that destroys its credibility. It comes in the way the proud Obama sycophant uses anonymous sourcing.
Any reputable style guide will tell you that Goldberg used anonymous sources in a fashion that should have rendered his piece ineligible for publication. It speaks to the demise of what many would consider credentialed and polished brands. There’s no way my former editors at Breitbart, The Blaze, and elsewhere would’ve let me publish something like this.
There are only two legitimate reasons to use anonymous sources in a piece:
The information has sensitive national security implications
The information, if linked to a certain individual, may threaten their physical wellbeing
Every other “reason” is almost always baloney and the mark of a fake news story.
Given that the piece discusses an alleged incident that occurred in 2020 under the Trump Administration, there is no security issue or worry that certain government personnel could be unmasked. There is also no safety issue.
The Goldberg piece uses anonymous sourcing as a weapon and a shield, both for himself and his “sources,” who are, in all likelihood, anti-Trump political operatives who have publicly endorsed Kamala Harris for president.
Formatting stories in this manner creates a purposeful accountability vacuum. The anonymous sources are free to peddle falsehoods and not be held accountable. It also allows for Goldberg to not be held accountable. Even if someone finds out who delivered him the information, he can just claim ignorance, having merely laundered their anonymous statement into his publication.
If you’re a Trump supporter, I wouldn’t be worried whatsoever. The piece reeks of desperation. It’s preposterous that the most philosemitic president in American history has some kind of secret Hitler fascination. The Democrats know they’re getting smoked, and this is more evidence that all momentum is with the former president heading into Election Day. The Kamala campaign is going so poorly that they decided to give her the day off on Tuesday, perhaps realizing that a “hide her in the basement” strategy might be more beneficial to her chances at this point.
Goldberg is a fraud. Trump is going to win. It’s a very weak “October surprise.” If this is all the Dems have in their arsenal, they’re cooked.
As I seem to recall, Hitler's generals tried to assassinate him multiple times.
They are desperate- both because Kamala is imploding and also to prove that they are still relevant. Do they really believe that Trump,voters and potential Trump voters will be influenced by an article sourced anonymously?