Should the AP, CNN, and The New York Times face criminal repercussions?
On one hand, if I'm a freelance reporter in the area, OF COURSE I'm going to try to run and cover the story. It wouldn't be surprising if some of these people sometimes also worked for CNN and other mainstream press sources.
BUT, if they KNEW IN ADVANCE of the attack........that's a whole different ball of wax.
Legacy corporate media has been little more than manipulative, deceitful politicized trash for some time now but if this is true they have mutated into promoters of utter evil.
It keeps getting worse.
Guess we shouldn't be surprised considering that the mainstream media is complicit in pushing the covid death shots which are bioweapons.
Same reason they have no problem with a wide open southern border. Traitors in our highest ranks.
If this holds after applying the all-critical “48-hour Rule” to all news since 2016, we SHOULD be looking at indictments. However, given the decrepit state of today’s journalism, it wouldn’t surprise me to see Pulitzer’s instead.
Being swedish, I'm not surprised by this.
After all, our Socialist-Democrat party which was in office until 2022 is offically allied with Al-Fatah, and has supported palestinian terrorism since the 1970s.
This kind of infiltration - in corporations, politics and media and academics - is nothing new to europeans, since it's been going on ever since the mass-murderer Arafat became the darling of politicians and media 50 years ago.
Supporting the "palestinian cause" has always only been a socially acceptable way of displaying the hatred of jews endemic to marxists, liberals and progressives everywhere.
Yes they should absolutely face repercussions. If they were tipped off and didn't tell anyone and allowed their outlets to push pro Hamas propaganda it's egerious and the offal icing on the offal cake of the offal that is/are these outlets.
Jordan, it looks like the page from Honestreporting.com has been moved. Here is the new link - https://honestreporting.com/photographers-without-borders-ap-reuters-pictures-of-hamas-atrocities-raise-ethical-questions/
Thank you for bringing this absolutely shocking situation to our attention!
The saddest thing about this is that the general populace won't realize the significance of these developments or even care.
My brother still insists that the "left-wing/liberal biased media" is a complete myth.
Similar to on 9/11, I suspect that on Oct 7th Netanyahu, Israeli Mossed, and US Intelligence knew that the attack was going to take place before it happened, and facilitated/enabled the attack to take place by taking down some of the normal safeguards that were in place to prevent against such an attack (with the ultimate intent of allowing the attack to take place so it could be used to rally support to go to war). I would not be surprised if, as was the case with the Israeli guys filming 9/11 and cheering, who later said that they were there to film the event, that there were people who where given a heads up about the Oct 7th attack beforehand so that they could film it. Ultimately, filming the attack on Oct 7th serves the agenda of Netanyahu and Israeli intelligence becuase it allows for people to see the Oct 7th brutal attack and get outraged and ultimately support Israel's war against Hamas. The Israeli Mossad slogan is "By way of deception thou shalt do war". https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1
Utter evil. If this is true, and it appears so from the photos, then they should be tried as terrorists.
News keeps getting sicker & sicker
“they should be called out to redefine the border between journalism and barbarism.”
Called out once meant Dueling.
to be sure, "freelance journalist" can mean anything. and depending on what side you're on, can mean a heroic risk-taking truth-capturer, or vile expedient propagandist.
but yes--the journalistic rigor of anyone openly employed by a major news agency in gaza--and with family and collegial tie there--is reasonably questionable.
They’re Advocacy Journalists, nothing new. Embedded with HAMAS, and of course their propagandists and sympathizers.
We had an answer for that in 1945, and it was hanging or prison. We hanged Germans, we put Tokyo Rose (a prisoner!) in Jail, and even poor PG Wodehouse (a hostage!) had to answer for injudicious remarks in a staged Nazi interview.
Lord Haw Haw (William Joyce) was hung for treason by the British.
The ridiculous notion that journalists, who are nearly always spies in any case, should be immune from the consequences of the side they choose, or be allowed to wander around war without consequences is simply another absurd obscenity of our degenerate times.
The journalists if in uniform with a recognized and declared allegiance may be treated as a POW- without such, a spy during wartime. 💀
Way back in the 80’s/90’s , CNN used to broadcast/Market themselves on tv about how good they are & the promo’s Video trap line used to be : We’re “There Before it happens” ( implying that cnn are so fast in reporting everything first ) now we see nothing had changed with the cartel media