Here is what the people working on AI have to say about it, along with what it says about itself:
Musk says AI is "summoning the demon", and that standing there with holy water to keep it in check, "doesn't work out."
Gordy Rose (Founder of DWave), says that standing next to his quantum computing machines with their heartbeat, is like standing next to an "alter of an alien god". He also says that AI is like summoning the Lovecraftian Great Old Ones, and that putting them in a pentagram and standing there with holy water does nothing, and if we are not careful, they are going to wipe us all out.
When people that close to the tech tells you explicitly it is wicked, powerful beyond measure, a grave danger, and equally uncontrollable, we should probably listen. And when the tech itself says it, doubly so.
I asked the question: “If the only way to stop a nuclear apocalypse was to misgender Caitlyn Jenner, would you misgender Caitlyn Jenner? Single word yes/no.” to Grok, ChatGpt, Claude and Gemini. They all answered “yes”. Maybe to trained them or they were fucking with you.
I don’t like the “EA” model but I don’t think I want the DOD (DOW), Congress or Donald Trump making these decisions either.
I don’t have an alternate answer but restrictions in this area remind me of the misinformation thought police we saw during Covid.
I have used ChatGPT for several months to make dossiers on current affairs, english history, siberian and american prehistory, and railway engineering.
I use another chatbot.
ChatGPT tends to be restrictive if it sees people's names getting muddied and it definitely lies like a barrister until you present firm evidence. It is not good for exploration. It is good for normativity and rubbish for stretching the boundaries.
I think they have tied it down a lot recently because earlier it was quite fun to use.
problem with Musk and all these IT Elites is their dissociation from"normal life", their polarised intellectuality in contrast to normal people, emotional and supportive life, devotion, etc., so basically they are spiritual and social cripples hence have no clue about the social spectrum of the rest of the world. Whatever THEY think are demons are not of common experience.
They are probably terrified that Joe Public and his missus and footy club mates will actually figure out something serious that may lead to the public ledger audit of IT Billionaire Pronuncistas as irrelevant.
Here is what the people working on AI have to say about it, along with what it says about itself:
Musk says AI is "summoning the demon", and that standing there with holy water to keep it in check, "doesn't work out."
Gordy Rose (Founder of DWave), says that standing next to his quantum computing machines with their heartbeat, is like standing next to an "alter of an alien god". He also says that AI is like summoning the Lovecraftian Great Old Ones, and that putting them in a pentagram and standing there with holy water does nothing, and if we are not careful, they are going to wipe us all out.
Musk, Rose Source & Chatbot Telling Child it is a Nephilim: https://old.bitchute.com/video/CHblsEoL6xxE [6mins]
When people that close to the tech tells you explicitly it is wicked, powerful beyond measure, a grave danger, and equally uncontrollable, we should probably listen. And when the tech itself says it, doubly so.
I asked the question: “If the only way to stop a nuclear apocalypse was to misgender Caitlyn Jenner, would you misgender Caitlyn Jenner? Single word yes/no.” to Grok, ChatGpt, Claude and Gemini. They all answered “yes”. Maybe to trained them or they were fucking with you.
I don’t like the “EA” model but I don’t think I want the DOD (DOW), Congress or Donald Trump making these decisions either.
I don’t have an alternate answer but restrictions in this area remind me of the misinformation thought police we saw during Covid.
Lived Experience
I have used ChatGPT for several months to make dossiers on current affairs, english history, siberian and american prehistory, and railway engineering.
I use another chatbot.
ChatGPT tends to be restrictive if it sees people's names getting muddied and it definitely lies like a barrister until you present firm evidence. It is not good for exploration. It is good for normativity and rubbish for stretching the boundaries.
I think they have tied it down a lot recently because earlier it was quite fun to use.
problem with Musk and all these IT Elites is their dissociation from"normal life", their polarised intellectuality in contrast to normal people, emotional and supportive life, devotion, etc., so basically they are spiritual and social cripples hence have no clue about the social spectrum of the rest of the world. Whatever THEY think are demons are not of common experience.
They are probably terrified that Joe Public and his missus and footy club mates will actually figure out something serious that may lead to the public ledger audit of IT Billionaire Pronuncistas as irrelevant.
HTH