4 Comments
User's avatar
TriTorch's avatar

An important heads up on AI conservatives: Musk says AI is "summoning the demon", and that standing there with holy water to keep it in check, "doesn't work out."

Gordy Rose (Founder of DWave), says that standing next to his quantum computing machines with their heartbeat, is like standing next to an "alter of an alien god". He also says that AI is like summoning the Lovecraftian Great Old Ones, and that putting them in a pentagram and standing there with holy water does nothing, and if we are not careful, they are going to wipe us all out.

Musk, Rose Source & Chatbot Telling Child it is a Nephilim: https://old.bitchute.com/video/CHblsEoL6xxE [6mins]

The Book of Enoch holds the Nephilim's and AI's secret:

Among the Most Fascinating Presentations on Book of Enoch, Fallen Angels, Nephilim, Giants, Spirits: https://old.bitchute.com/video/CVLBF3QP6PlE [68mins]

Quantum computing messes with the very fabric of God's reality. It is a host for demons.

Book of Enoch: the one book that explains AI that every Christian needs to study immediately, that was ruthlessly mocked and cast out to ensure almost no Christian would.

Nick's avatar

Its an interesting topic, that people seem to know is there but gloss over it. You are correct in your analysis. I don't know what we are supposed to do though. The few people in government representing us probably have no idea how AI even works. Changing minds is a difficult task too and it may indeed be too late. Also I am pretty sure it will be impossible to regulate, like the internet or bitcoin (oh I know they try...). We are dealing with sociopaths and psychopaths on the left who will absolutely use AI for nefarious purposes, for our own good of course. My personal opinion is we should embrace the tech, we will be forced to at some point anyway. AI goes way beyond chat-bots which is what everyone thinks it is. AI will end up being so much more then some text on a screen and it will be invasive. It will be omnipresent like how our cell phones are now and even more so. We might not be able to change policy but we might be able to guard against it, if we understand it. The more conservatives use and embrace AI the more skin in the game we will have as a whole. Which means better odds of fighting against it or even shaping it.

JW Writes's avatar

I don't disagree, but as a 60 year old woman (who never has a real use for AI), I don't know how I have any say whatsoever in the shape of it. Other than potentially reading long docs/contracts, what would I use it for? And how would my use effect it? Those are genuine questions as "just a user" (in the most optimistic scenario)... I know they learn but I doubt they learn from "hey Grok, tell me what this test result means" or "find me a recipe for risotto".

JerryB's avatar

There are several angles to view this. My first angle is how pols are using my tax dollars to prop this up with data center "investments" that will, in turn, drive up my electric bill. My second angle is the mental conditioning of the public, i.e., we are the experiment. It's everywhere and we must encounter it every day. Then there are the pundits hyping the next age of evolution, and the naysayers with doom and gloom.

My recommendation is to get oneself grounded in reality. I'd recommend Catholic reality handed down to us from the great Doctors and thinkers. There's natural discovery, too, because reality is built into us. Or, take my dear deceased grandma, "Don't believe anything you hear, and only half of what you see." She didn't live to see the Internet. She might want to modify her advice!