COVID shots were both marketed by Big Pharma and authorized by the government under the core claim that they prevent transmission

Both parties peddled baseless assertions.

With the United States shattering records for recorded COVID-19 cases across the board, it’s time to dissect all of the revisionist history in the waters these days.

KoaTheGreat @KoaTheGreat

They sold the vaccines as if they stop transmission and stop the spread.

Big Pharma and government regulators sold and authorized COVID shots to the masses using the core claim that they were providing something akin to a cure. These so-called vaccines were sold as immunization agents (that’s why they called them vaccines), not as a therapy treatment that may at some point down the line help reduce your symptoms if you acquire the disease.

There’s one major problem with their claim.

It’s baseless. Entirely baseless.

First, let’s start with Big Pharma.

Albert Bourla @AlbertBourla

Excited to share that updated analysis from our Phase 3 study with BioNTech also showed that our COVID-19 vaccine was 100% effective in preventing #COVID19 cases in South Africa. 100%!

pfizer.comPfizer and BioNTech Confirm High Efficacy and No Serious Safety Concerns Through Up to Six Months Following Second Dose in Updated Topline …Analysis of 927 confirmed symptomatic cases of COVID-19 demonstrates BNT162b2 is highly effective with 91.3% vaccine efficacy observed against COVID-19, measured seven days through up to six months after the second dose Vaccine was 100% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. C…

Big Pharma COVID shot companies have repeatedly insinuated their injections would effectively eradicate COVID-19. Why did they make this claim? Well, Pfizer and Moderna, for their part, pulled information from limited trial data without actually releasing information on patients related to virus carriage and/or shedding. There was no real basis to these immunization claims, but Pfizer and Moderna made them anyway, and the government played along.

Jean Rees @JeanRees10

And yet, it was clearly stated at the 12/10/20 VRBPAC, that the FDA did not request data on virus carriage and shedding, the fundamental basis for herd immunity. And Fauci and Marks sold it that way, anyway. If they were in a publicly traded company they would be sued for fraud

Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.substack.com @JordanSchachtel

The idea that mRNA shots "stop the spread" was first popularized by Big Pharma COVID shot companies. In my view, it was a business decision to expand the purchase orders. It was the main selling point for government bulk orders. Everyone needed one to "protect" the vulnerable.

All of the “stop the spread” claims were based on sketchy trial data completely detached from firm scientific evidence. And worse, whistleblowers have come forward to claim that the trials may have been modified to help sell the product.

Pfizer Inc. @pfizer

BREAKING: Today, with @BioNTech_Group, we initiated the submission of a BLA for @FDA approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech #COVID19 vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 16 years and older.

ZelfzorgCovid19 @ZelfzorgCovid19

BMJ British Medical Journey - “I don’t think it was good clean data,” the employee said of the data Ventavia generated for the Pfizer trial. “It’s a crazy mess.”

bmj.comCovid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trialRevelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open lette…

That didn’t for a second stop government bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci and CDC Director Rochelle Walensky from manipulating the masses into believing the shots would eradicate the virus itself.

Yashar Ali 🐘 @yashar

Fauci says Covid-19 vaccine may not get US to herd immunity if too many people refuse to get it. Anti-Vaxxers and vaccine skeptics will put immunocompromised people at risk.

cnn.comFauci says Covid-19 vaccine may not get US to herd immunity if too many people refuse to get it<a href=“http://www.cnn.com/2020/06/28/health/fauci-coronavirus-vaccine-contact-tracing-aspen/index.html” target=“_blank”>Dr. Anthony Fauci</a> says he would “settle” for a Covid-19 vaccine that’s 70% to 75% effective, but that this incomplete protection, coupled with the fact that many Americans sa…

Cernovich @Cernovich

They said the vaccine stopped transmission. Now they are lying and saying they didn’t. Video proof here 👇

Fauci and the “public health” gang remains on the warpath against the “unvaccinated,” but there remains zero real evidence that the non-compliant spread disease at an increased rate.

The New York Times @nytimes

Thousands more flights were canceled on Monday as Omicron surged. Dr. Anthony Fauci said a vaccine mandate for air travel should be considered.

nyti.msFlight disruptions continue with thousands more cancellations as Omicron thins airline crews.At least 2,600 more flights were canceled globally on Monday, including about 1,000 U.S. flights.

Of course, this never stopped the “public health” cadre from imposing one insane edict after another while baselessly claiming it would stop the spread of a virus.

Memory Hole: virtually every major health official in the United States has claimed that COVID shots stop the virus

Now, Big Pharma defenders may claim that these baseless assertions about “stopping the spread” were made when Pfizer and Moderna, among others, were monitoring trial patients who had acquired previous mutations of the virus.

However, the COVID-19 mRNA shots have never been modified. The first shot is the same as the second shot, and the booster shots are just different amounts of the same ingredients. If the shots used to stop the spread, and they no longer do, the effective end point of this critique should result in the FDA pulling authorization of the product.

Speaking of the FDA.

The FDA fully authorized the mRNA shots for Pfizer and Moderna under the central contention that they were unbelievably effective in *stopping the spread* of COVID-19. The evidence is available for anyone to access on the FDA’s website.

The Pfizer-BioNtech shot was specifically authorized “for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.” This didn’t mean the prevention of severe vs mild disease. The government regulatory body made crystal clear that they were not talking about symptomatic infection, but simply testing positive.

“Based on results from the clinical trial, the vaccine was 91% effective in preventing COVID-19 disease,” the FDA press release read. That 91% number comes from a CDC study that claims both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots “reduce the risk of infection by 91 percent for fully vaccinated people.” Commenting on the study, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky claimed the shots would work to “prevent most infections.”

There was never any real scientific evidence that Big Pharma and the federal government had found a way to stop the spread of a coronavirus, but they claimed otherwise. As evidence above, the baseless idea that the shots stop the spread was not only part of the sales job, it was the most important part of the sales job.

Check out our loyal sponsor:

TrustCapital is the #1 Bitcoin and precious metals IRA/401K platform in America. Sign up using my promo code DOSSIER and you will receive the benefits of tax-free investing and trading with ZERO MONTHLY FEES! Linked here and in the banner.